resolve-git-conflicts

Resolve merge and rebase conflicts with safe recovery strategies. Covers identifying conflict sources, reading conflict markers, choosing resolution strategies, and continuing or aborting operations safely. Use when a git merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop reports conflicts, when a git pull results in conflicting changes, or when you need to safely abort and restart a failed merge or rebase operation.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "resolve-git-conflicts" with this command: npx skills add pjt222/development-guides/pjt222-development-guides-resolve-git-conflicts

Resolve Git Conflicts

Identify, resolve, and recover from merge and rebase conflicts.

When to Use

  • A git merge or git rebase reports conflicts
  • A git cherry-pick cannot apply cleanly
  • A git pull results in conflicting changes
  • A git stash pop conflicts with current working tree

Inputs

  • Required: Repository with active conflicts
  • Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
  • Optional: Context about which changes should take priority

Procedure

Step 1: Identify the Conflict Source

Determine what operation caused the conflict:

# Check current status
git status

# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict

The status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation is in progress.

Expected: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates the active operation.

On failure: If git status shows a clean tree but you expected conflicts, the operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.

Step 2: Read Conflict Markers

Open each conflicting file and locate the conflict markers:

<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
  • <<<<<<< HEAD to =======: Your current branch (or the branch you're rebasing onto)
  • ======= to >>>>>>>: The incoming changes (the branch being merged or the commit being applied)

Expected: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> markers.

On failure: If no markers are found but files show as conflicting, the conflict may be a binary file or a deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for the full list.

Step 3: Choose a Resolution Strategy

Manual merge (most common): Edit the file to combine both changes logically, then remove all conflict markers.

Accept ours (keep current branch's version):

# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R

# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A

Accept theirs (keep incoming branch's version):

# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R

# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A

Expected: After resolution, the file contains the correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.

On failure: If you chose the wrong side, re-read the conflicting version from the merge base. During a merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates the conflict markers so you can try again.

Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved

After editing each conflicting file:

# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R

# Check remaining conflicts
git status

Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".

Expected: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.

On failure: If git add fails or markers remain, re-open the file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> lines are removed.

Step 5: Continue the Operation

Once all conflicts are resolved:

For merge:

git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message

For rebase:

git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4

For cherry-pick:

git cherry-pick --continue

For stash pop:

# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"

Expected: The operation completes. git status shows a clean working tree (or moves to the next commit during rebase).

On failure: If the continue command fails, check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continuing.

Step 6: Abort if Needed

If resolution is too complex or you chose the wrong approach, abort safely:

# Abort merge
git merge --abort

# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort

# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort

Expected: Repository returns to the state before the operation started. No data loss.

On failure: If abort fails (rare), check git reflog to find the commit before the operation and git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — this discards uncommitted changes.

Step 7: Verify Resolution

After the operation completes:

# Verify clean working tree
git status

# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1

# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)

Expected: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.

On failure: If tests fail after resolution, the merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts are resolved. Review the diff carefully and fix.

Validation

  • No conflict markers (<<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>>) remain in any file
  • git status shows a clean working tree
  • The merge/rebase history is correct in git log
  • Tests pass after conflict resolution
  • No unintended changes were introduced

Common Pitfalls

  • Blindly accepting one side: --ours or --theirs discards the other side entirely. Only use when you are certain one version is completely correct.
  • Leaving conflict markers in code: Always search the entire file for remaining markers after editing. A partial resolution breaks the code.
  • Amending during rebase: During an interactive rebase, do not --amend unless the rebase step specifically calls for it. Use git rebase --continue instead.
  • Losing work on abort: git rebase --abort and git merge --abort discard all resolution work. Only abort if you want to start over.
  • Not testing after resolution: A syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
  • Force-pushing after rebase: After rebasing a shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing, as it rewrites history.

Related Skills

  • commit-changes - committing after conflict resolution
  • manage-git-branches - branch workflows that lead to conflicts
  • configure-git-repository - repository setup and merge strategies

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

review-ux-ui

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

review-web-design

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

create-work-breakdown-structure

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

argumentation

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review