prowler-pr

Creates Pull Requests for Prowler following the project template and conventions. Trigger: When working on pull request requirements or creation (PR template sections, PR title Conventional Commits check, changelog gate/no-changelog label), or when inspecting PR-related GitHub workflows like conventional-commit.yml, pr-check-changelog.yml, pr-conflict-checker.yml, labeler.yml, or CODEOWNERS.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "prowler-pr" with this command: npx skills add prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-cloud-prowler-prowler-pr

PR Creation Process

  1. Analyze changes: git diff main...HEAD to understand ALL commits
  2. Determine affected components: SDK, API, UI, MCP, Docs
  3. Fill template sections based on changes
  4. Create PR with gh pr create

PR Template Structure

### Context

{Why this change? Link issues with `Fix #XXXX`}

### Description

{Summary of changes and dependencies}

### Steps to review

{How to test/verify the changes}

### Checklist

<details>

<summary><b>Community Checklist</b></summary>

- [ ] This feature/issue is listed in [here](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/issues?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen) or roadmap.prowler.com
- [ ] Is it assigned to me, if not, request it via the issue/feature in [here](https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowler/issues?q=sort%3Aupdated-desc+is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen) or [Prowler Community Slack](goto.prowler.com/slack)

</details>

- Are there new checks included in this PR? Yes / No
    - If so, do we need to update permissions for the provider?
- [ ] Review if the code is being covered by tests.
- [ ] Review if code is being documented following https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.md#38-comments-and-docstrings
- [ ] Review if backport is needed.
- [ ] Review if is needed to change the Readme.md
- [ ] Ensure new entries are added to CHANGELOG.md, if applicable.

#### SDK/CLI
- Are there new checks included in this PR? Yes / No
    - If so, do we need to update permissions for the provider? Please review this carefully.

#### UI (if applicable)
- [ ] All issue/task requirements work as expected on the UI
- [ ] Screenshots/Video - Mobile (X < 640px)
- [ ] Screenshots/Video - Tablet (640px > X < 1024px)
- [ ] Screenshots/Video - Desktop (X > 1024px)
- [ ] Ensure new entries are added to ui/CHANGELOG.md

#### API (if applicable)
- [ ] All issue/task requirements work as expected on the API
- [ ] Endpoint response output (if applicable)
- [ ] EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for new/modified queries or indexes (if applicable)
- [ ] Performance test results (if applicable)
- [ ] Any other relevant evidence of the implementation (if applicable)
- [ ] Verify if API specs need to be regenerated.
- [ ] Check if version updates are required.
- [ ] Ensure new entries are added to api/CHANGELOG.md

### License

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Component-Specific Rules

ComponentCHANGELOGExtra Checks
SDKprowler/CHANGELOG.mdNew checks → permissions update?
APIapi/CHANGELOG.mdAPI specs, version bump, endpoint output, EXPLAIN ANALYZE, performance
UIui/CHANGELOG.mdScreenshots for Mobile/Tablet/Desktop
MCPmcp_server/CHANGELOG.mdN/A

Commands

# Check current branch status
git status
git log main..HEAD --oneline

# View full diff
git diff main...HEAD

# Create PR with heredoc for body
gh pr create --title "feat: description" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
### Context
...
EOF
)"

# Create draft PR
gh pr create --draft --title "feat: description"

Title Conventions

Follow conventional commits:

  • feat: New feature
  • fix: Bug fix
  • docs: Documentation
  • chore: Maintenance
  • refactor: Code restructure
  • test: Tests

Before Creating PR

  1. ✅ All tests pass locally
  2. ✅ Linting passes (make lint or component-specific)
  3. ✅ CHANGELOG updated (if applicable)
  4. ✅ Branch is up to date with main
  5. ✅ Commits are clean and descriptive

Resources

  • Documentation: See references/ for links to local developer guide

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

typescript

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

zod-4

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

react-19

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

tailwind-4

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review