Review -- Track Code Review

Review the implementation of a track against its specification and plan. Verifies intent match, code quality, test coverage, and security.

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS

• <track-name> : Match track by name or ID substring

• --current : Auto-select the in-progress ([~] ) track

• No args: ask user which track to review, or fall back to uncommitted/staged changes if no tracks exist

Step 1: Select Track

• If --current : Find the [~] track in .maestro/tracks.md

• If track name given: Match by ID or description substring

• If no args and tracks exist: List completed and in-progress tracks, ask user

• If no args and no tracks: Fall back to reviewing uncommitted changes via git diff HEAD

Step 2: Load Track Context

Read all track files:

• .maestro/tracks/{track_id}/spec.md -- requirements to verify against

• .maestro/tracks/{track_id}/plan.md -- task SHAs and completion status

• .maestro/tracks/{track_id}/metadata.json -- track metadata

• .maestro/context/code_styleguides/ -- code style references (if exist)

• .maestro/context/product-guidelines.md -- product/brand/UX guidelines (if exists)

Step 3: Collect Commits

If metadata.json has beads_epic_id : use br list --status closed --parent {epic_id} --all --json and parse close_reason for SHAs (sha:{7char} ). Otherwise: parse plan.md for all [x] {sha} markers.

If no SHAs found (and a track was selected): "Nothing to review." Stop.

If operating in arbitrary scope (no track), skip -- diff collected in Step 4.

Step 4: Aggregate Diffs

Track mode

git diff {first_sha}^..{last_sha}

Arbitrary scope (no track)

git diff HEAD

If diff > 300 lines, offer Iterative Review Mode (per-file review).

Step 5: Run Automated Checks

CI=true {test_command} {lint_command} {typecheck_command}

Report pass/fail for each check.

Step 6: Review Dimensions

Analyze the diff against 5 dimensions: intent match, code quality, test coverage, security, product guidelines. See reference/review-dimensions.md for full criteria per dimension.

Step 7: Generate Report

Format findings with severity ratings and checkbox verification. See reference/report-template.md for the full report format and verdict options (PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / NEEDS CHANGES).

Step 8: Auto-fix Option

If verdict is not PASS, offer auto-fix, manual-only, per-fix review, or complete-track-anyway. See reference/report-template.md for the auto-fix protocol.

Step 9: Post-Review Cleanup

Offer archive, delete, keep, or skip for the track. See reference/report-template.md for cleanup options.

Relationship to Other Commands

Recommended workflow:

• /maestro:setup -- Scaffold project context (run first)

• /maestro:new-track -- Create a feature/bug track with spec and plan

• /maestro:implement -- Execute the implementation

• /maestro:review -- You are here. Verify implementation correctness

• /maestro:status -- Check progress across all tracks

• /maestro:revert -- Undo implementation if needed

• /maestro:note -- Capture decisions and context to persistent notepad

Review works best after commits are made, as it analyzes git history to understand what was implemented. It compares the implementation against the spec from /maestro:new-track and the plan from /maestro:implement . If issues are found, use /maestro:revert to undo and re-implement, or apply fixes directly.

Remember: Good validation catches issues before they reach production. Be constructive but thorough in identifying gaps or improvements.