component-usage-analysis

Analyse component dependencies and usage patterns in a Drupal/Twig component library. Use when user asks to find where a component is used, check if a component can be safely removed, audit component dependencies, find components using specific properties, or analyse impact of refactoring a component.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "component-usage-analysis" with this command: npx skills add schalkneethling/webdev-agent-skills/schalkneethling-webdev-agent-skills-component-usage-analysis

Component Usage Analysis

Analyse component dependencies and usage patterns to support safe refactoring and removal.

Trigger Phrases

  • "Find all usages of <component>"
  • "Which components use <component>?"
  • "Check if <component> can be safely removed"
  • "Find components using <component> with property X"
  • "Audit dependencies for <component>"
  • "What would break if I change <component>?"

Configuration

This skill assumes the component library structure:

apps/component-library/
├── src/components/
│   ├── elements/
│   ├── patterns/
│   ├── template-components/
│   └── templates/

Analysis Methodology

Step 1: Identify the Target

Clarify with the user:

  1. Target component: Which component to analyse (e.g., elements/image)
  2. Properties of interest: Specific properties to filter by (optional)
  3. Analysis goal: Usage audit, removal check, or refactoring impact

Step 2: Twig Include Analysis

Find all components that include the target via Twig.

Search pattern:

grep -rn "{% include \"@<tier>/<component>" src/components/

Example for elements/image:

grep -rn '{% include "@elements/image' src/components/

For each match:

  1. Note the file path (consuming component)
  2. Extract the with {} block to identify which properties are passed
  3. Record whether target properties are present

Extracting the with block:

Twig includes may span multiple lines:

{% include "@elements/image/image.twig" with {
    src: item.image.src,
    alt: item.image.alt,
    description: item.image.description
} %}

Use multi-line search or examine files directly when the with block is complex.

See references/search-patterns.md for detailed patterns.

Step 3: Mock Reference Analysis

Find all components whose mocks reference the target component.

Search pattern:

grep -rn '\$ref: <tier>/<component>#' src/components/

Example for elements/image:

grep -rn '\$ref: elements/image#' src/components/

For each match:

  1. Note the file path and variant name referenced
  2. Look up the referenced variant in the target's mocks.yaml
  3. Check if the variant includes the properties of interest

Cross-referencing variants:

If a mock uses $ref: elements/image#with-caption, check elements/image/mocks.yaml to see what properties that variant defines.

Step 4: Categorise Results

Group findings into categories based on the analysis goal:

For property-specific analysis:

  • Uses WITH property X: Components that pass/use the property
  • Uses WITHOUT property X: Components that use the target but don't use property X

For removal analysis:

  • Direct Twig includes: Would break immediately
  • Mock references only: May need mock updates but won't break rendering
  • No dependencies: Safe to remove

For refactoring analysis:

  • Affected by change: Components using the property/feature being changed
  • Unaffected: Components using the target but not the changed aspect

Step 5: Verification

Ensure comprehensive coverage before reporting:

  1. Count total files:

    find src/components -name "*.twig" | wc -l
    find src/components -name "mocks.yaml" | wc -l
    
  2. Verify search found expected files:

    • Spot-check known usages
    • Confirm count matches expectations
  3. Check for alternative patterns:

    • Embedded includes: {% include "@elements/image/image.twig" %}
    • Variable includes: {% include image_template %}
    • Embed blocks: {% embed "@elements/image/image.twig" %}
  4. Report confidence level:

    • High: All patterns checked, counts verified
    • Medium: Primary patterns checked
    • Low: Quick scan only

Output Format

Provide results in a clear structure:

## Component Usage Analysis: <component>

### Summary
- Total usages found: X
- Twig includes: Y
- Mock references: Z

### Uses WITH <property>
1. `patterns/card/card.twig` - passes description in with block
2. `patterns/teaser/mocks.yaml` - references variant with description

### Uses WITHOUT <property>
1. `patterns/hero/hero.twig` - only passes src, alt
2. `template-components/header/mocks.yaml` - references minimal variant

### Verification
- Searched X .twig files
- Searched Y mocks.yaml files
- Confidence: High

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Removing a Property

User: "Can I remove the copyright property from elements/image?"

  1. Search for Twig includes passing copyright
  2. Search for mock references to variants with copyright
  3. Report which components would need updates
  4. Recommend: Update consumers first, then remove property

Scenario: Safe Component Removal

User: "Is elements/legacy-button used anywhere?"

  1. Search for Twig includes of the component
  2. Search for mock references
  3. Search for library references in templates
  4. If zero results across all searches → safe to remove

Scenario: Refactoring Impact

User: "I want to rename description to caption in elements/image"

  1. Find all usages passing description
  2. Provide list of files requiring updates
  3. Estimate scope of change

Notes

  • Always verify comprehensively before recommending removal
  • Check both Twig files AND mocks.yaml files
  • Consider indirect dependencies (component A uses B which uses C)
  • Report confidence level with results

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Security

frontend-security

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

semantic-html

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

css-coder

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review