commit

Write a Conventional Commits v1.0.0 message mirroring the repo's last 5 commits, stamp the `on-behalf-of: @browzeremb` org-attribution trailer (per GitHub's organization-commit doc — orgs link via `on-behalf-of:`, NOT `Co-authored-by:` which is for human collaborators), and run `git commit`. Reports the SHA. Does NOT push. Use whenever the user wants to commit staged changes. Triggers: commit, commit this, save this, checkpoint, finish this task, ship this commit, write a commit message, conventional commit.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from SkillsMP metadata and should be treated as untrusted until upstream source review is completed.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "commit" with this command: npx skills add browzeremb/skillsmp-browzeremb-browzeremb-commit

No markdown body

This source entry does not include full markdown content beyond metadata.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Open in GitHub

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

execute-task

Implement one task end-to-end by dispatching domain specialists per its `task.explorer.skillsFound[]`. Each specialist loads project skills first, writes code scoped to `task.scope`, reports gates + invariants, and aggregates into `task.execution`. For free-form requests without a plan, calls `generate-task` first. Tests are NOT authored at this phase — they're written after `code-review` + `receiving-code-review` by the `write-tests` skill. Triggers: execute TASK_03, run the first task, implement task 02, do this task, ship TASK_N, build the feature from the plan, 'implement this'.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-0browzeremb
Coding

orchestrate-task-delivery

Master orchestrator for any feature, bugfix, or refactor that touches more than a few files in a Browzer-indexed repo. Drives the full pipeline: brainstorming (when vague) → PRD → task plan → execute → code-review → receiving-code-review → write-tests → update-docs → feature-acceptance → commit. Grounds decisions in `browzer explore`/`search`/`deps`; delegates all implementation to specialist subagents. Mid-workflow entry also welcome ('execute TASK_03', 'update the docs', 'commit what I staged'). Skip only for trivial ≤3-file read-only lookups. Triggers: build this, ship this end-to-end, implement this feature, refactor X, fix this bug, drive the workflow, run the dev pipeline, 'let's start'.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-0browzeremb
Coding

receiving-code-review

Consumes `codeReview.findings[]` from the previous CODE_REVIEW step and dispatches per-domain fix agents until EVERY finding (high → low) reaches `status: fixed`. Each fix agent receives the finding body, the source file, browzer deps + mentions, and the relevant skill from `finding.assignedSkill`. Zero-tech-debt contract: a clean run leaves no open finding behind. Use after `code-review` and before `write-tests`. Triggers: receive code review, apply code review fixes, fix the findings, close the review, fix-findings, address review feedback, resolve code review.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-0browzeremb
Coding

update-docs

Find every markdown doc whose accuracy depends on the just-changed code and patch it in place. Three signals: `browzer mentions` reverse traversal, direct-path-refs in markdown, and concept-level docs (CLAUDE.md invariants, ADRs, runbooks, READMEs) via `browzer deps --reverse` + `explore` + `search`. Patches existing docs only — never writes new ones. Triggers: update the docs, sync the documentation, docs are stale, refresh the README, propagate changes to docs, 'we changed X — what docs cover X'.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
-0browzeremb
commit | V50.AI