architecture-decision
Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.
Validates a UX spec, dashboard design, or interaction pattern library for completeness, accessibility compliance, design spec alignment, and implementation readiness. Produces APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict with specific gaps.
This listing is imported from SkillsMP metadata and should be treated as untrusted until upstream source review is completed.
Install skill "ux-review" with this command: npx skills add sadowskr/skillsmp-sadowskr-sadowskr-ux-review
This source entry does not include full markdown content beyond metadata.
This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.
Related by shared tags or category signals.
Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all design specs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every design spec technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies stack compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.
Guided product concept ideation — from zero idea to a structured product concept document. Uses professional studio ideation techniques, user psychology frameworks, and structured creative exploration.
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its design spec, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its design spec requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.