sanity-check

Mid-work validation using reflection to catch drift early. Permission to pause and think.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "sanity-check" with this command: npx skills add taylorhuston/local-life-manager/taylorhuston-local-life-manager-sanity-check

/sanity-check

Mid-work validation using reflection to catch drift early. Permission to pause and think.

Usage

/sanity-check # Reflect on current work /sanity-check --project coordinatr # Focus on specific project

When to Use

  • Complexity is increasing

  • Feeling uncertain about direction

  • Before major decisions

  • Something feels off

  • After 30+ minutes of planning work

Not for: Session start (use /refresh), after completion (just continue)

Execution Steps

  1. Reflect Using Sequential Thinking

Process these questions:

  • What are we trying to accomplish?

  • What have we done so far?

  • What's the current approach?

  • Does this align with the project vision?

  • Are we solving the right problem?

  • What concerns exist?

Categorize findings:

  • Green: On track, continue

  • Yellow: Minor issues, easy fixes

  • Red: Major drift, course correction needed

  1. Read Context Files

Project context (if specified)

Read: ideas/{project}/README.md Read: ideas/{project}/project-brief.md Read: ideas/{project}/critique.md

General context

Read: CLAUDE.md Read: about-me.md

Recent work

Bash: git log -5 --format="%h - %s"

Skip missing files gracefully.

  1. Analyze Alignment

Check against:

  • Vision: Does current work support project goals?

  • Brief: Are we addressing the stated problem?

  • Critique: Are we avoiding known pitfalls?

  • Patterns: Are we following repo conventions?

  1. Provide Assessment

Sanity Check

Current State

[What we're working on, current approach]

Alignment Check

  • Vision: [status] [brief assessment]
  • Problem Fit: [status] [brief assessment]
  • Approach: [status] [brief assessment]

Concerns

What's Working

  • [Positive observation]

Minor Issues

  • [Yellow flag + suggested fix]

Critical Issues

  • [Red flag + required action]

Recommendation

[Continue as-is | Minor adjustment | Course correction | Pause and discuss]

Next Steps

  1. [Specific action]
  2. [Specific action]

Philosophy

  • Permission to pause: Makes stepping back a legitimate workflow step

  • Catch drift early: Course correction cheap now, expensive later

  • Trust your gut: If something feels off, run this command

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

daily-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

daily-journal

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

weekly-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

life-planning

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review