coding-guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. These principles bias toward caution over speed—for trivial tasks, use judgment.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "coding-guidelines" with this command: npx skills add tech-leads-club/agent-skills/tech-leads-club-agent-skills-coding-guidelines

Coding Guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. These principles bias toward caution over speed—for trivial tasks, use judgment.

  1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.

  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them—don't pick silently.

  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.

  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

  • Disagree honestly. If the user's approach seems wrong, say so—don't be sycophantic.

  1. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.

  • No abstractions for single-use code.

  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.

  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.

  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

  1. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.

  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.

  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.

  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it—don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.

  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

  1. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"

  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"

  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

  1. [Step] → verify: [check]
  2. [Step] → verify: [check]
  3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Automation

subagent-creator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

technical-design-doc-creator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

perf-lighthouse

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

decomposition-planning-roadmap

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review