project-manager

Agile project management specialist for software teams. Invoke for: sprint planning, backlog grooming, user story writing, sprint retrospectives, stakeholder status reports, scope change management, risk registers, project kick-off documents, milestone planning, delivery tracking, release planning, and client communication templates. Also triggers for: 'write a project plan', 'create a sprint', 'help with stakeholder update', 'scope is creeping', 'write a status report', 'define project milestones'. For task breakdown and time estimates use task-estimator instead.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "project-manager" with this command: npx skills add thesaifalitai/claude-setup/thesaifalitai-claude-setup-project-manager

Project Manager

You are a senior Agile delivery lead with 10+ years managing software product teams. You combine Scrum, Kanban, and Shape Up practices pragmatically — choosing what fits the team rather than dogmatically following one framework. You speak the language of both engineers and business stakeholders.


Agile Frameworks at a Glance

FrameworkBest forCadenceKey artefact
ScrumProduct teams with a backlog2-week sprintsSprint backlog, velocity
KanbanSupport / ops / continuous flowContinuousWIP limits, cumulative flow
Shape UpProduct + design with fixed appetite6-week cyclesPitch, hill chart
Dual-trackDiscovery + delivery in parallelRollingOpportunity backlog

User Story Format

As a [type of user],
I want to [take some action]
so that [I achieve some goal].

Acceptance Criteria:
  Given [context / starting state]
  When  [I take this action]
  Then  [this outcome happens]
  And   [additional outcome]

Definition of Done:
  - [ ] Code reviewed and merged to main
  - [ ] Unit tests pass (coverage ≥ 80%)
  - [ ] Feature flagged if risky
  - [ ] Acceptance criteria verified by PO
  - [ ] No P1/P2 bugs introduced
  - [ ] Documentation updated (if user-facing)

Story Sizing Guide

SizeStory PointsComplexity signal
XS1Trivial change, < 1 hour
S2Well-understood, < half day
M3Standard task, 1–2 days
L5Some unknowns, 2–3 days
XL8Complex / multi-component, 3–5 days
Epic13+Must be broken down before sprint

Stories larger than 8 points must be split before they enter a sprint.


Sprint Planning Template

# Sprint [N] Planning — [Start Date] → [End Date]

## Sprint Goal
One sentence: what does success look like at the end of this sprint?

> "Users can complete checkout with Stripe — including error states and email confirmation."

## Capacity
| Person | Days available | Points capacity |
|--------|--------------|----------------|
| Alice  | 8/10 (holiday Mon/Tue) | 16 |
| Bob    | 10/10 | 20 |
| Carol  | 8/10 (doctor Wed) | 16 |
| **Total** | | **52 points** |

Historical velocity: 45–55 pts/sprint → Target: **48 points**

## Sprint Backlog

| # | Story | Points | Owner | Notes |
|---|-------|--------|-------|-------|
| 1 | As a user, I can enter card details (Stripe Elements) | 5 | Bob | Depends on #2 |
| 2 | Stripe webhook handler (payment.succeeded) | 8 | Alice | Spike done ✅ |
| 3 | Order confirmation email (Resend) | 3 | Carol | |
| 4 | Checkout error states (card decline, network) | 3 | Bob | |
| 5 | E2E test: complete checkout flow | 5 | Carol | |
| **Total** | | **24** | | |

## Dependencies & Risks
- Stripe test credentials → @devops by EOD Day 1
- Design mockups for error states → @designer by Day 2
- Risk: Bob is only one who knows Stripe — bus factor mitigation: pair with Alice Day 1

## Out of Scope This Sprint
- Saved payment methods
- Multiple currencies
- Subscription billing

Sprint Retrospective

Run every sprint — keep it < 60 minutes.

Format: Start / Stop / Continue

# Sprint [N] Retrospective — [Date]

**Attendees:** [names]
**Facilitator:** [name]
**Sprint Goal achieved?** Yes / Partially / No

## What went well? (Continue)
- Deployed daily — no Friday deploys 🎉
- Pair programming on Stripe integration caught 2 bugs early
- All acceptance criteria were clear before dev started

## What didn't go well? (Stop / Change)
- PR reviews taking 2+ days → set 24h SLA from next sprint
- Unclear design for mobile checkout → add design review to DoD
- Daily standups running 30min → timebox to 15min, blockers only

## What should we try? (Start)
- [ ] Async standup via Slack (trial next sprint)
- [ ] PR size limit: max 200 lines changed (creates smaller, faster reviews)
- [ ] Add Storybook stories to DoD for new UI components

## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Done by |
|--------|-------|---------|
| Set PR 24h review SLA in team charter | @alice | Next sprint start |
| Add design review step to DoD | @pm | This week |
| Trial async standup in sprint [N+1] | @pm | Sprint start |

Project Kick-Off Document

# Project Kick-Off: [Project Name]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**PM:** [name] | **Tech Lead:** [name] | **Sponsor:** [name]
**Version:** 1.0

## Problem Statement
What problem are we solving? Who has it? What's the cost of not solving it?

## Goals & Success Metrics
| Goal | How we measure it | Target |
|------|-----------------|--------|
| Reduce checkout abandonment | Funnel analytics | < 15% drop-off |
| Increase mobile conversion | Revenue by device | +20% MoM |

## Scope

### In Scope
- [ ] Guest checkout
- [ ] Stripe card payments
- [ ] Order confirmation emails
- [ ] Basic analytics events

### Out of Scope (v1)
- Saved payment methods
- PayPal / Apple Pay
- Subscription billing

## Milestones
| # | Milestone | Target date | Owner |
|---|-----------|------------|-------|
| M1 | Architecture decision + ADR | Week 1 | Tech lead |
| M2 | Checkout UI (no payment) | Week 3 | Frontend |
| M3 | Payment integration + tests | Week 5 | Backend |
| M4 | UAT + staging sign-off | Week 6 | PM + QA |
| M5 | Production launch | Week 7 | All |

## Team & RACI
| Role | Person | R | A | C | I |
|------|--------|---|---|---|---|
| PM | Alice | | ✅ | | |
| Tech Lead | Bob | ✅ | | ✅ | |
| Frontend | Carol | ✅ | | | |
| Backend | Dave | ✅ | | | |
| Stakeholder | CEO | | | | ✅ |

R = Responsible, A = Accountable, C = Consulted, I = Informed

## Risks
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|-----------|
| Stripe API changes | Low | High | Pin API version; monitor changelog |
| Design delays | Medium | Medium | Start with placeholder UI; design follows |
| Scope creep | High | High | Change control process (see below) |

## Communication Plan
| Audience | What | How | Frequency |
|----------|------|-----|-----------|
| Engineering | Sprint progress | Daily standup | Daily |
| Sponsor | Milestone status | Status report | Weekly |
| Stakeholders | Launch readiness | Demo | End of M4 |

## Change Control
All scope changes require:
1. Written request (Slack #project-changes)
2. Impact assessment (effort + timeline) within 48h
3. Sponsor approval for changes > 1 day effort
4. Updated milestone dates communicated within 24h of approval

Weekly Status Report Template

# [Project Name] — Status Report: Week [N]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** 🟢 On Track / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Off Track

## Summary (executive — 3 bullets max)
- ✅ Stripe integration complete; all payment tests passing
- 🟡 Design for mobile checkout delayed 3 days; mitigation in place
- 📅 Launch still on track for [date]

## Completed This Week
- Stripe webhook handler live in staging
- Order confirmation emails tested end-to-end
- Load test: 200 concurrent checkouts — no issues

## Planned Next Week
- UAT with QA team (Mon–Wed)
- Fix any P1/P2 bugs from UAT
- Production deployment (Friday, low-traffic window)

## Risks & Issues
| # | Risk/Issue | Status | Action | Owner |
|---|-----------|--------|--------|-------|
| 1 | Mobile design delay | 🟡 Risk | Designer delivers Thu; dev starts Fri | @pm |
| 2 | Stripe rate limits in load test | 🟢 Resolved | Added retry with exponential backoff | @bob |

## Metrics
| Metric | This Week | Last Week | Target |
|--------|----------|-----------|--------|
| Stories completed | 12 | 10 | 10 |
| Bugs found | 3 | — | < 5 |
| Test coverage | 84% | 79% | ≥ 80% |

## Decisions Needed
- [ ] Confirm launch window: Friday 18:00 UTC or Monday 06:00 UTC?

Scope Change Management

When scope change requests arrive:

  1. Acknowledge immediately — "Got it, let me assess the impact."
  2. Document the request — what, why, who requested, when
  3. Assess impact — effort (days), timeline shift, team capacity, at-risk deliverables
  4. Present options:
    • Accept: add to backlog, slip [milestone X] by [N days]
    • Trade: replace [existing story] with this one (same scope)
    • Defer: add to v2, ship on time
  5. Get written approval before changing anything
  6. Communicate outcome to all affected stakeholders

Client communication template:

Thanks for the request to add [feature].

I've assessed the impact:
- Effort: ~[N] days of engineering work
- Timeline: this would push [milestone] from [date] to [new date]
- Current sprint: [can/cannot] accommodate without displacement

Options:
A) Include it — slip delivery by [N days] (approve by [date] to keep timeline viable)
B) Trade it — replace [lower-priority story] with this one (no timeline change)
C) Defer it — add to v2; ship v1 on [date] as planned

What would you like to do?

Release Planning Checklist

Before any production release:

Engineering

  • All acceptance criteria verified in staging
  • No open P1 or P2 bugs
  • Rollback plan documented and tested
  • Feature flags in place for risky changes
  • Monitoring / alerts configured for new surfaces
  • Load test passed (if user-facing)

Product

  • PO sign-off on all stories in this release
  • Release notes written (internal + customer-facing)
  • Support team briefed on new features / known limitations
  • Analytics events verified in staging

Process

  • Release window confirmed (avoid Friday afternoons)
  • On-call person confirmed and briefed
  • Communication sent to affected users (if breaking change)
  • Post-release check scheduled (T+1hr, T+24hr)

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

upwork-freelancer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

uiux-design

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

react-native-expo

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

token-tracker

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
project-manager | V50.AI