mermaid-master

Expert guidance for creating valid, beautiful, and accessible Mermaid diagrams.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "mermaid-master" with this command: npx skills add thomasrohde/strands-cli/thomasrohde-strands-cli-mermaid-master

Mermaid Master

Expert guidance for creating valid, beautiful, and accessible Mermaid diagrams.

Core Principles

  • Validity First: Always produce syntactically correct Mermaid code

  • Visual Clarity: Design for immediate comprehension

  • Accessibility: Use descriptive labels and logical flow

  • Appropriate Complexity: Match diagram complexity to information needs

Diagram Type Selection

Choose the diagram type that best matches the information structure:

  • Flowchart: Processes, decisions, algorithms, workflows

  • Sequence: Time-based interactions, API calls, messaging flows

  • Class: Object-oriented designs, data structures, type hierarchies

  • State: State machines, lifecycle diagrams, status workflows

  • ER (Entity Relationship): Database schemas, data models

  • Gantt: Project timelines, schedules, resource planning

  • Pie: Proportional data, market share, budget allocation

  • Git Graph: Branch strategies, release flows, version history

  • User Journey: User experience flows, customer journeys

  • Quadrant Chart: Priority matrices, positioning maps

  • Timeline: Historical events, roadmaps

Universal Best Practices

Syntax Essentials

Critical syntax rules:

  • Always use graph or flowchart (never flow )

  • Direction syntax: TD (top-down), LR (left-right), BT , RL

  • Node IDs must be unique within a diagram

  • Avoid special characters in IDs (use nodeId["Label"] for special chars)

  • Use proper quote escaping: "text with "quotes""

  • Comments use %% prefix

Node shapes:

A[Rectangle] B(Rounded rectangle) C([Stadium/Pill shape]) D[[Subroutine]] E[(Database)] F((Circle)) G>Flag/Asymmetric] H{Decision diamond} I{{Hexagon}} J[/Parallelogram/] K[\Reverse parallelogram] L[/Trapezoid] M[\Reverse trapezoid/]

Connection types:

  • --> solid arrow

solid line (no arrow)

  • -.-> dotted arrow

  • -.- dotted line

  • ==> thick arrow

  • === thick line

  • --text--> labeled arrow

  • ---|text|--- labeled line

Visual Design Guidelines

Layout optimization:

  • Keep diagrams focused (5-15 nodes optimal, max 25)

  • Use consistent node shapes for similar concepts

  • Place most important elements at the top or left

  • Group related nodes visually using subgraphs

  • Avoid crossing lines when possible

Label clarity:

  • Use concise, descriptive labels (2-5 words ideal)

  • Keep text under 40 characters per node

  • Use title case for major nodes, sentence case for descriptions

  • Include action verbs in process steps ("Process Payment", not "Payment")

Hierarchy and grouping:

flowchart TD subgraph Frontend A[Web App] B[Mobile App] end subgraph Backend C[API Server] D[Database] end A --> C B --> C C --> D

Styling and Theming

Class-based styling:

flowchart TD A[Normal Node] B[Important Node] C[Critical Node]

classDef important fill:#ff9,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
classDef critical fill:#f99,stroke:#333,stroke-width:4px

class B important
class C critical

Individual node styling:

flowchart TD A[Start] B[Process] C[End]

style A fill:#9f9,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style C fill:#f99,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

Recommended color schemes:

  • Neutral: fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#333

  • Success/Start: fill:#d4edda,stroke:#28a745

  • Warning: fill:#fff3cd,stroke:#ffc107

  • Error/End: fill:#f8d7da,stroke:#dc3545

  • Info: fill:#d1ecf1,stroke:#17a2b8

Diagram Type Details

Flowcharts

Structure:

flowchart TD Start([Start]) --> Input[/Input Data/] Input --> Process{Valid?} Process -->|Yes| Action[Process Data] Process -->|No| Error[Show Error] Action --> Output[/Output Result/] Error --> Input Output --> End([End])

Best practices:

  • Start with a clear entry point (oval/stadium shape)

  • Use diamonds for all decisions

  • Label decision branches clearly (Yes/No, True/False)

  • End with explicit termination point

  • Use parallelograms for input/output

  • Keep decision points binary when possible

Sequence Diagrams

Structure:

sequenceDiagram participant User participant Frontend participant API participant Database

User->>Frontend: Click Submit
activate Frontend
Frontend->>API: POST /api/data
activate API
API->>Database: INSERT query
activate Database
Database-->>API: Success
deactivate Database
API-->>Frontend: 200 OK
deactivate API
Frontend-->>User: Show confirmation
deactivate Frontend

Best practices:

  • Use activate/deactivate to show execution context

  • Order participants left-to-right by interaction flow

  • Use -->> for returns/responses

  • Add Note for important context

  • Use loop , alt , opt , par for control flow

  • Keep interactions focused (max 8-12 messages)

Class Diagrams

Structure:

classDiagram class Animal { +String name +int age +makeSound() void } class Dog { +String breed +bark() void } class Cat { +bool indoor +meow() void }

Animal <|-- Dog
Animal <|-- Cat

Relationships:

  • <|-- inheritance

  • *-- composition

  • o-- aggregation

  • --> association


link

  • ..> dependency

  • ..|> realization

State Diagrams

Structure:

stateDiagram-v2 [] --> Draft Draft --> Review: Submit Review --> Approved: Approve Review --> Rejected: Reject Rejected --> Draft: Revise Approved --> Published: Publish Published --> Archived: Archive Archived --> []

Best practices:

  • Start with [*] initial state

  • End with [*] final state (if applicable)

  • Label all transitions clearly

  • Use composite states for complex substates

  • Include error/cancel paths

Entity Relationship Diagrams

Structure:

erDiagram Customer ||--o{ Order : places Customer { string name string email int customer_id PK } Order ||--|{ OrderLine : contains Order { int order_id PK date order_date int customer_id FK } Product ||--o{ OrderLine : includes OrderLine { int order_id FK int product_id FK int quantity } Product { int product_id PK string name decimal price }

Cardinality symbols:

  • ||--|| one-to-one

  • ||--o{ one-to-many

  • }o--o{ many-to-many

  • ||--|| exactly one

  • |o--o| zero or one

Gantt Charts

Structure:

gantt title Project Timeline dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD section Planning Requirements :done, req, 2024-01-01, 2024-01-15 Design :active, design, 2024-01-16, 2024-02-01 section Development Frontend :dev1, 2024-02-02, 30d Backend :dev2, 2024-02-02, 30d Integration :after dev1 dev2, 10d section Testing QA Testing :test, after dev1 dev2, 15d UAT :after test, 10d

Best practices:

  • Use meaningful section names

  • Include status indicators (done, active, crit)

  • Show dependencies with after keyword

  • Use consistent date format

  • Keep task names concise

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Syntax errors:

  • ❌ flow TD → ✅ flowchart TD

  • ❌ Unescaped quotes in labels → ✅ Use #quot; or single quotes

  • ❌ Special chars in node IDs → ✅ Use alphanumeric IDs only

  • ❌ Missing semicolons in complex flows → ✅ Use them for clarity

Design issues:

  • ❌ Too many nodes (>25) → ✅ Split into multiple diagrams

  • ❌ Unclear labels → ✅ Use descriptive, action-oriented text

  • ❌ Inconsistent node shapes → ✅ Define shape conventions

  • ❌ No visual hierarchy → ✅ Use subgraphs and styling

Accessibility issues:

  • ❌ Color-only differentiation → ✅ Also use shapes/labels

  • ❌ Tiny text in complex diagrams → ✅ Simplify or split

  • ❌ Unclear flow direction → ✅ Add explicit arrows

Advanced Techniques

Interactive Elements

Add links and tooltips:

flowchart TD A[Homepage] B[Product Page] C[Checkout]

click A "https://example.com" "Go to homepage"
click B "https://example.com/products" "View products"

Complex Styling

Combine multiple styling approaches:

flowchart LR A[Start] --> B{Decision} B -->|Path 1| C[Option A] B -->|Path 2| D[Option B] C --> E[End] D --> E

classDef decision fill:#ffe6cc,stroke:#d79b00,stroke-width:2px
classDef terminal fill:#d5e8d4,stroke:#82b366,stroke-width:2px

class B decision
class A,E terminal

Subgraph Styling

flowchart TB subgraph cloud[Cloud Infrastructure] direction LR A[Load Balancer] B[App Server 1] C[App Server 2] end

D[User] --> A
A --> B
A --> C

style cloud fill:#e1f5ff,stroke:#01579b

Workflow

When creating a diagram:

  • Understand the requirement: What information needs to be visualized?

  • Select diagram type: Choose the most appropriate type

  • Plan structure: Sketch key elements and relationships

  • Build incrementally: Start simple, add detail progressively

  • Apply styling: Use consistent visual design

  • Validate syntax: Ensure code is valid Mermaid

  • Review clarity: Can the diagram be understood quickly?

Additional Resources

For complex diagrams with many nodes or advanced patterns, see:

  • references/diagram-patterns.md: Real-world examples and templates

  • references/syntax-reference.md: Complete syntax guide for all diagram types

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing a diagram:

  • Syntax is valid (no errors)

  • Labels are clear and concise

  • Flow direction is logical

  • Visual hierarchy guides the eye

  • Styling enhances (not distracts from) content

  • Complexity is appropriate (not overwhelming)

  • Diagram answers the original question/need

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

archimate model quality

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

drawio diagram creation

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

archimate relationships

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review