context-analyzer

Scan project structure and build a context model for intelligent documentation creation.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "context-analyzer" with this command: npx skills add vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/vladm3105-aidoc-flow-framework-context-analyzer

context-analyzer

Purpose

Scan project structure and build a context model for intelligent documentation creation.

Problem Solved: AI assistants lack awareness of project context, existing artifacts, and current workflow state when creating documentation, leading to missing references and duplicate content.

Solution: Analyze project directories, parse artifact metadata and traceability sections, and build a context model that surfaces relevant information for new document creation.

When to Use This Skill

Use context-analyzer when:

  • Starting documentation work in an existing project

  • Creating a new artifact that needs upstream references

  • Need to understand what documentation already exists

  • Want to identify gaps in documentation coverage

  • Preparing context for doc-* skill invocation

Do NOT use when:

  • Project has no existing documentation

  • Working on a single, isolated document

  • Full project audit needed (use trace-check instead)

Skill Inputs

Input Type Required Description

project_root string Yes Root path of the project to analyze

target_artifact_type string No Artifact type being created (e.g., "PRD", "SPEC")

depth string No Analysis depth: "quick" (structure only), "standard" (default), "deep" (full content)

Skill Workflow

Step 1: Scan Project Structure

Enumerate all documentation artifacts by type and location:

Directory Patterns:

{project_root}/ ├── docs/ │ ├── BRD/ │ ├── PRD/ │ ├── EARS/ │ ├── BDD/ │ ├── ADR/ │ ├── SYS/ │ ├── REQ/ │ ├── IMPL/ │ ├── CTR/ │ ├── SPEC/ │ └── TASKS/ └── ai_dev_flow/ (framework templates)

Artifact Discovery:

Example discovery pattern

find {project_root}/docs -name ".md" -o -name ".yaml" -o -name "*.feature"

Output Structure:

artifact_inventory: BRD: count: 3 files: - id: BRD-01 path: docs/BRD/BRD-01_platform_foundation.md title: Platform Foundation status: Approved - id: BRD-02 path: docs/BRD/BRD-02_partner_integration.md title: Partner Integration status: Draft PRD: count: 2 files: - id: PRD-01 path: docs/PRD/PRD-01_core_features.md title: Core Features status: In Review SPEC: count: 0 files: []

Step 2: Parse Artifact Metadata

Extract metadata and key information from discovered artifacts:

YAML Frontmatter Extraction:

From document header


title: "BRD-01: Platform Foundation" tags:

  • platform-brd
  • shared-architecture custom_fields: layer: 1 artifact_type: BRD status: Approved

Document Control Extraction:

Document Control

ItemDetails
StatusApproved
Version2.1.0
Last Updated2025-11-15

Parsed Metadata Model:

artifact_metadata: BRD-01: title: Platform Foundation layer: 1 status: Approved version: 2.1.0 last_updated: 2025-11-15 tags: [platform-brd, shared-architecture]

Step 3: Extract Traceability Information

Parse Section 7 Traceability from each artifact:

Upstream Sources Extraction:

Upstream Sources

SourceTypeReference
BRD-01Business RequirementsPlatform foundation

Downstream Artifacts Extraction:

Downstream Artifacts

ArtifactTypeReference
SPEC-01Technical SpecificationAPI implementation

Traceability Graph:

traceability_graph: BRD-01: upstream: [] downstream: [PRD-01, PRD-00] PRD-01: upstream: [BRD-01] downstream: [EARS-01, SPEC-01] SPEC-01: upstream: [PRD-01, REQ-01] downstream: [TASKS-01]

Step 4: Determine Workflow Position

Calculate current position in SDD workflow:

Layer Mapping:

Layer Artifact Type Required Upstream

1 BRD None

2 PRD BRD

3 EARS PRD

4 BDD EARS

5 ADR BDD

6 SYS ADR

7 REQ SYS

8 IMPL REQ (optional)

9 CTR IMPL or REQ (optional)

10 SPEC REQ, optional IMPL/CTR

11 TASKS SPEC

Position Analysis:

workflow_position: completed_layers: [1, 2, 3] current_layer: 4 next_required: [BDD, ADR] gaps: - layer: 3 type: EARS status: incomplete reason: "Only 2 of 5 PRD features have EARS coverage"

Step 5: Identify Upstream Candidates

For a target artifact type, identify relevant upstream documents:

Relevance Scoring:

Factor Weight Description

Direct upstream 50% Immediate predecessor in workflow

Topic match 30% Key terms and domain alignment

Recency 10% Recently updated documents

Status 10% Approved documents preferred

Upstream Candidates Output:

upstream_candidates: target_type: SPEC candidates: - id: REQ-01 relevance: 95% title: API Requirements reason: "Direct upstream, topic match: API, approved status" - id: REQ-02 relevance: 80% title: Data Model Requirements reason: "Direct upstream, related topic: data" - id: ADR-005 relevance: 70% title: API Architecture Decision reason: "Architecture context for API design"

Step 6: Extract Key Terms

Build project vocabulary from existing documentation:

Term Extraction Methods:

  • Document titles and headers

  • Glossary sections

  • Frequently used technical terms

  • Domain-specific vocabulary

Key Terms Output:

key_terms: domain_terms: - term: workflow frequency: 45 documents: [BRD-01, PRD-01, REQ-01] - term: resource frequency: 32 documents: [BRD-01, REQ-02, SPEC-01] technical_terms: - term: WebSocket frequency: 18 documents: [ADR-003, SPEC-01] - term: PostgreSQL frequency: 12 documents: [BRD-01, ADR-000]

Step 7: Build Context Model

Assemble complete context model for session use:

Complete Context Model:

context_model: project_root: /path/to/project scan_timestamp: 2025-11-29T14:30:00Z scan_depth: standard

artifact_inventory: total_count: 25 by_type: BRD: 3 PRD: 5 EARS: 4 BDD: 6 ADR: 3 REQ: 4 SPEC: 0 TASKS: 0

workflow_position: completed_layers: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7] current_layer: 7 ready_for: [SPEC, TASKS] gaps: - type: SYS status: missing impact: "SPEC creation may lack system context"

upstream_candidates: target_type: SPEC primary: - id: REQ-01 title: Core API Requirements relevance: 95% secondary: - id: ADR-003 title: WebSocket Architecture relevance: 75%

key_terms: domain: [workflow, resource, validation, processing] technical: [WebSocket, PostgreSQL, Redis, REST API]

coverage_gaps: - area: Testing description: "BDD scenarios cover only 60% of EARS requirements" - area: Implementation description: "No SPEC or TASKS documents created yet"

Example Usage

Example 1: Pre-SPEC Context

User Request: "I'm about to create a SPEC document, what context do I have?"

Context Analysis:

context_summary: target: SPEC creation readiness: ready upstream_available: - REQ-01: Core API Requirements (Approved) - REQ-02: Data Model Requirements (Approved) - ADR-003: WebSocket Architecture (Approved) recommended_references: - "Reference REQ-01 for API endpoint specifications" - "Include ADR-003 for WebSocket implementation decisions" warnings: - "No CTR (contract) documents exist - consider if API contracts needed"

Example 2: Gap Analysis

User Request: "What documentation is missing in this project?"

Gap Analysis Output:

documentation_gaps: critical: - type: SYS reason: "No system requirements linking ADR to REQ" impact: "REQ documents may lack architectural context" - type: SPEC reason: "No technical specifications for implementation" impact: "Cannot proceed to code generation" moderate: - type: BDD coverage: 60% reason: "4 of 10 EARS requirements have BDD scenarios" low: - type: IMPL reason: "Implementation plan optional but recommended for complex projects"

Example 3: Quick Structure Check

User Request: "What docs exist in this project?"

Quick Scan Output (depth: quick):

project_structure: docs_directory: /project/docs artifact_counts: BRD: 3 PRD: 5 EARS: 4 BDD: 6 ADR: 3 SYS: 0 REQ: 4 IMPL: 0 CTR: 0 SPEC: 0 TASKS: 0 total_artifacts: 25 workflow_coverage: 50% (6 of 12 layers)

Integration with Other Skills

Integration Description

skill-recommender Provides project context for better recommendations

doc-* skills Supplies upstream candidates and key terms

quality-advisor Shares artifact inventory for validation

workflow-optimizer Provides workflow position data

trace-check Overlaps with traceability extraction (uses trace-check for deep validation)

Quality Gates

Definition of Done

  • Project structure scanned successfully

  • All artifact types discovered

  • Metadata extracted from discovered artifacts

  • Traceability graph built

  • Workflow position calculated

  • Upstream candidates identified for target type

  • Context model assembled and returned

Performance Targets

Metric Target

Quick scan latency <500ms

Standard scan latency <2s for 100 artifacts

Deep scan latency <5s for 100 artifacts

Memory usage <200MB for 100 artifacts

Traceability

Required Tags:

@prd: PRD.000.002 @adr: ADR-000

Upstream Sources

Source Type Reference

PRD-00 Product Requirements PRD-00

ADR-000 Architecture Decision ADR-000

Downstream Artifacts

Artifact Type Reference

skill-recommender Skill Consumer Uses context for better recommendations

doc-* skills Skill Consumer Uses context for artifact creation

Version Information

Version: 1.0.0 Created: 2025-11-29 Status: Active Author: AI Dev Flow Framework Team

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

n8n

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

google-adk

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

doc-prd

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

mermaid-gen

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review