doc-flow (Orchestrator)

Purpose

This skill serves as the orchestrator for the AI-Driven Specification-Driven Development (SDD) workflow. It provides:

• Skill Selection Guidance: Helps determine which artifact-specific skill to use

• Workflow Overview: Complete 15-layer SDD architecture

• General SDD Principles: Specification-driven methodology fundamentals

• Integration Guidance: How skills work together

For Artifact Creation: Use the specific artifact skill (doc-brd, doc-prd, doc-ears, doc-bdd, doc-adr, doc-sys, doc-req, doc-impl, doc-ctr, doc-spec, doc-tasks, doc-ref, doc-naming).

Authoritative Reference: ai_dev_flow/SPEC_DRIVEN_DEVELOPMENT_GUIDE.md

Prerequisites

⚠️ For New Projects (Greenfield): If starting a brand new project with no existing folder structure, use the project-init skill FIRST to initialize project structure, select domain, create folders, and configure setup. Then return here to begin workflow execution.

For Existing Projects: If project is already initialized (docs/ folders exist, domain configured), proceed directly with this skill.

Skill Selection Decision Tree

"Which Skill Do I Need?"

Answer these questions to find the right skill:

Q1: What stage are you at in the workflow?

• Starting new project with business requirements → Use doc-brd skill

• Have BRD, need product requirements → Use doc-prd skill

• Have PRD, need formal requirements → Use doc-ears skill

• Have EARS, need test scenarios → Use doc-bdd skill

• Have BDD, need architecture decisions → Use doc-adr skill

• Have ADR, need system requirements → Use doc-sys skill

• Have SYS, need atomic requirements → Use doc-req skill

• Have REQ, need implementation planning → Use doc-impl skill (if complex) or skip to doc-spec

• Have REQ/IMPL, need API contracts → Use doc-ctr skill (if interface requirement)

• Have REQ/CTR, need technical specifications → Use doc-spec skill

• Have SPEC, need task breakdown → Use doc-tasks skill

• Have TASKS, need implementation contracts → Add Section 8 to TASKS (see doc-tasks skill)

• Have TASKS, ready to code → Implement code per TASKS

• Need supplementary documentation (overview, glossary, guides) → Use doc-ref skill

Q2: What are you trying to do?

• Define business needs and objectives → doc-brd

• Define product features and KPIs → doc-prd

• Write formal WHEN-THE-SHALL-WITHIN requirements → doc-ears

• Create Gherkin test scenarios → doc-bdd

• Document architecture decisions → doc-adr

• Define system requirements → doc-sys

• Define atomic requirements → doc-req

• Plan project implementation (WHO/WHEN/WHAT) → doc-impl

• Define API contracts → doc-ctr

• Write technical specifications → doc-spec

• Break down into AI tasks → doc-tasks

• Define implementation contracts for parallel dev → Add Section 8 to TASKS (see doc-tasks skill)

• Create supplementary documentation (project overview, glossary, guides) → doc-ref

• General guidance or unsure → Stay with doc-flow (this skill)

Complete SDD Workflow (15 Layers)

Authoritative Reference: ai_dev_flow/SPEC_DRIVEN_DEVELOPMENT_GUIDE.md

Workflow Sequence

Strategy (Layer 0) ↓ BRD (Layer 1) → doc-brd skill ↓ PRD (Layer 2) → doc-prd skill ↓ EARS (Layer 3) → doc-ears skill ↓ BDD (Layer 4) → doc-bdd skill ↓ ADR (Layer 5) → doc-adr skill ↓ SYS (Layer 6) → doc-sys skill ↓ REQ (Layer 7) → doc-req skill ↓ IMPL (Layer 8) [OPTIONAL] → doc-impl skill ↓ CTR (Layer 9) [OPTIONAL - IF INTERFACE] → doc-ctr skill ↓ SPEC (Layer 10) → doc-spec skill ↓ TASKS (Layer 11) → doc-tasks skill ↓ Code (Layer 12) ↓ Tests (Layer 13) ↓ Validation (Layer 14)

Layer Descriptions

Layer Artifact Purpose Skill

0 Strategy Business owner documents External (strategy/)

1 BRD Business requirements doc-brd

2 PRD Product requirements doc-prd

3 EARS Formal requirements (WHEN-THE-SHALL) doc-ears

4 BDD Gherkin test scenarios doc-bdd

5 ADR Architecture decisions doc-adr

6 SYS System requirements doc-sys

7 REQ Atomic requirements doc-req

8 IMPL Implementation plans (WHO/WHEN) [OPTIONAL] doc-impl

9 CTR API contracts [OPTIONAL - IF INTERFACE] doc-ctr

10 SPEC Technical specifications (HOW) doc-spec

11 TASKS Task breakdown for implementation doc-tasks

11+ ICON Implementation Contracts (Section 8 of TASKS) doc-tasks

12 Code Python implementation Implementation

13 Tests Test suites Implementation

14 Validation BDD + contract + traceability Validation

Optional Layers Decision Logic

When to Create IMPL (Layer 8):

• Create IMPL When: Duration ≥2 weeks, teams ≥3, components ≥5, critical budget/timeline, external dependencies

• Skip IMPL When: Single component, duration <2 weeks, single developer, low risk

• Reference: ai_dev_flow/WHEN_TO_CREATE_IMPL.md

When to Create CTR (Layer 9):

• Create CTR When: Public APIs, event schemas, data models, version compatibility requirements, interface between components

• Skip CTR When: Internal logic only, no external interface, no serialization

• Reference: ai_dev_flow/WHEN_TO_CREATE_IMPL.md#when-to-create-ctr-after-impl

General SDD Principles

1. Specification-Driven Development Philosophy

Core Principle: Formalize before implementing

• Traditional Approach: Code first, document later (or never)

• SDD Approach: Document first, generate code from specifications

Why SDD Works:

• Clarity: Requirements are explicit before coding begins

• Traceability: Every line of code traces to business requirements

• Validation: Tests defined before implementation

• Consistency: Templates ensure uniform structure

• Speed: Code generation from YAML specifications (48x faster)

2. Information Flow Hierarchy

Changes flow DOWN (never UP):

strategy/ (WHAT - Product Owner Voice) ├── Strategy business logic └── Performance targets ↓ ↓ Referenced by ↓ 📚 docs/ (WHY + HOW - Project Documentation) ├── Requirements (WHY) ├── Architecture (HOW) └── Specifications (IMPLEMENTATION) ↓ ↓ Generates ↓ 💻 Source Code (Python/Infrastructure)

📝 ai_dev_flow/ feeds into 📚 docs/ for consistency

Golden Rules:

• Strategy → Documentation → Code (one-way flow)

• Code cannot change strategy

• Always use templates from ai_dev_flow/ when creating docs in docs/

• All business logic must reference strategy/ sections

3. Directory Structure and Roles

Critical Context: This project has three key directories with distinct roles:

strategy/

• WHAT (Product Owner Voice)

Primary Authority: Authoritative business strategy and domain logic

• core_algorithm.md

• Primary algorithm specifications

• strategy_overview.md

• Strategic framework and operating modes

• risk_management.md

• Risk management policies

• business_rules.md

• Domain-specific business rules

• selection_criteria/

• Entry criteria and scoring algorithms

• Performance targets, state machines, resource budgets

Golden Rule: All business logic must trace back to these strategy documents.

📚 docs/

• PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

Implementation Documentation: Requirements, architecture, specifications

• docs/BRD/

• Business Requirements Documents

• Nested folder structure: docs/BRD/BRD-NN/BRD-NN.S_slug.md

• docs/PRD/

• Product Requirements Documents

• Nested folder structure: docs/PRD/PRD-NN/PRD-NN.S_slug.md

• docs/ADR/

• Architecture Decision Records (HOW)

• Nested folder structure: docs/ADR/ADR-NN/ADR-NN.S_slug.md

• docs/BDD/

• BDD acceptance tests (Behavior-Driven Development)

• docs/CTR/

• API Contracts (dual-file format: .md + .yaml)

• docs/IMPL/

• Implementation Plans (Project Management: WHO/WHEN)

• docs/SPEC/

• YAML technical specifications

• docs/TASKS/

• Code Generation Plans (AI-structured implementation tasks)

Note: BRD, PRD, ADR use section-based nested folders by default. Other types use flat structure.

Purpose: Document how strategy is implemented through architecture and code.

📝 ai_dev_flow/

• AUTHORITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD

Development Standard and Templates: The single source of truth for SDD workflow

• Status: Authoritative development standard for this project

• Contents: Complete SDD workflow (BRD → PRD → EARS → BDD → ADR → SYS → REQ → IMPL → CTR → SPEC → TASKS → Code)

• Templates: {TYPE}-TEMPLATE.{ext} for each artifact type (BRD, PRD, EARS, BDD, ADR, SYS, REQ, IMPL, CTR, SPEC, TASKS, REF)

• Indices: {TYPE}-00_index.{ext} listing all documents of each type

• READMEs: Detailed usage guides and best practices for each artifact type

• Standards: ID naming, traceability format, cross-referencing rules

• Examples: Reference implementations with full traceability chains

Purpose: Define the complete development methodology with templates, standards, and examples for creating all artifacts.

⚠️ CRITICAL: Archived Documents Restriction

STRICTLY PROHIBITED: DO NOT access, reference, link to, or use ANY files or directories containing the word "archived" in their path.

Automatic Filtering Rules:

• ❌ Skip any path containing archived , Archived , ARCHIVED , or archive

• ❌ Ignore files in directories with "archived" in the name

• ❌ Do not read, suggest, or reference archived content

• ❌ Do not use archived documents even if they appear in search results

Active Documentation Only:

• strategy/ (current strategy - excludes archived subdirs)

• docs/ (active project documentation)

• ai_dev_flow/ (authoritative templates and standards)

If archived content is needed:

• Stop immediately

• Inform user that content is in archived location

• Request explicit permission before proceeding

4. Traceability Importance

Complete Audit Trail: Every artifact must trace back to original business requirements

Benefits:

• Impact Analysis: Know what breaks when requirements change

• Regulatory Compliance: Industry-specific audit requirements (ISO, SOC2, etc.)

• Change Management: Track all changes through artifact chain

• Coverage Metrics: Measure implementation completeness

• Quality Assurance: Automated validation prevents gaps

Implementation:

• Cumulative tagging hierarchy (see SHARED_CONTENT.md)

• Traceability section in every document

• Bidirectional traceability matrices

• Automated validation scripts

5. Upstream Artifact Policy (CRITICAL)

⚠️ MANDATORY RULE: Do NOT create missing upstream artifacts. Skip functionality instead.

Policy Statement: If a required upstream artifact is missing, the downstream functionality MUST NOT be implemented. This enforces the SDD document hierarchy where every implementation must have proper business/product justification through the complete artifact chain.

Decision Rules:

Situation Action

Upstream exists Reference with exact document ID

Upstream required but missing Skip that functionality - do NOT implement

Upstream optional and missing Use null in traceability tag

Upstream not applicable Omit tag entirely

Rationale:

• Prevents orphaned code: No implementation without business justification

• Enforces governance: Changes must flow through proper channels

• Maintains audit trail: Every feature traces to business need

• Reduces technical debt: No undocumented "nice-to-have" features

When Upstream is Missing:

• Stop - Do not proceed with implementation

• Report - Inform user which upstream artifact is missing

• Advise - Recommend creating upstream artifacts first through proper channels

• Skip - Move on to functionality that has complete upstream chain

Reference: ai_dev_flow/TRACEABILITY.md - Section "Step 3: Decision Rules"

Integration with Other Skills

Core Workflow Skills

project-init

• Initialize new project structure

• Use BEFORE doc-flow for greenfield projects

• Creates folder structure, domain setup, baseline files

• Reference: .claude/skills/project-init/SKILL.md

trace-check

• Validate traceability after artifact creation

• Use AFTER doc-flow to verify bidirectional links

• Validates cumulative tagging, ID formats, link resolution

• Detects orphaned artifacts and traceability gaps

• Reference: .claude/skills/trace-check/SKILL.md

doc-naming

• Unified ID naming standards enforcement

• Use for ID format validation across all artifact types

• Validates 4-segment element IDs (TYPE.NN.TT.SS)

• Enforces variable-length DOC_NUM (2+ digits)

• Reference: .claude/skills/doc-naming/SKILL.md

doc-validator

• Cross-document validation orchestrator

• Validates traceability across all layers

• Detects gaps, broken links, and format violations

• Runs auto-fix actions for common issues

• Reference: .claude/skills/doc-validator/SKILL.md

Planning & Architecture

adr-roadmap

• Generate implementation roadmaps from ADRs

• Use AFTER creating ADR artifacts

• Creates timeline, risk assessment, dependency mapping

• Reference: .claude/skills/adr-roadmap/SKILL.md

project-mngt

• MVP/MMP/MMR planning

• Use for strategic release planning

• Integrates with IMPL artifacts

• Reference: .claude/skills/project-mngt/SKILL.md

Typical Workflow Integration

1. project-init → Initialize project (greenfield only)
2. doc-brd → Create BRD
3. doc-prd → Create PRD
4. doc-ears → Create EARS
5. doc-bdd → Create BDD
6. doc-adr → Create ADR
7. doc-sys → Create SYS
8. doc-req → Create REQ
9. doc-impl → Create IMPL (if complex)
10. doc-ctr → Create CTR (if interface)
11. doc-spec → Create SPEC
12. doc-tasks → Create TASKS
13. Implementation → Execute based on TASKS
14. trace-check → Validate traceability

Shared Standards

CRITICAL: All artifact-specific skills share common standards defined in:

.claude/skills/doc-flow/SHARED_CONTENT.md

This document contains:

• Document ID Naming Standards

• Traceability Section Format

• Cumulative Tagging Hierarchy

• Quality Gates & Validation

• Traceability Matrix Enforcement

• Documentation Standards

• Document Control Section Requirements

All artifact skills (doc-brd through doc-tasks, plus doc-ref, doc-naming) import these shared standards.

Diagram Standards (Global Requirement)

All diagrams MUST use Mermaid syntax. Text-based diagrams (ASCII art, box drawings) are prohibited.

• Authority Document: ai_dev_ssd_flow/DIAGRAM_STANDARDS.md

• Syntax Generation: mermaid-gen skill

• File Management: charts-flow skill (SVG conversion, embedding)

Allowed Exception: Directory tree structures (using ├── └── │ ) are permitted as they represent file structure, not diagrams.

Validation Overview

Automated Validation Tools

Quality Gates Validation:

Validate artifact meets layer transition requirements (≥90%)

./scripts/validate_quality_gates.sh docs/REQ/risk/lim/REQ-03.md

Artifact-specific validation

./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_brd_template.sh docs/BRD/BRD-01.md ./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_req_template.sh docs/REQ/api/ib/REQ-02.md

Link integrity validation

./ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_links.py --path docs/ --check-anchors

Tag-Based Traceability Validation:

Complete workflow (extract → validate → generate)

python ai_dev_flow/scripts/generate_traceability_matrices.py --auto

Individual steps

python ai_dev_flow/scripts/extract_tags.py --source src/ docs/ tests/ python ai_dev_flow/scripts/validate_tags_against_docs.py --strict python ai_dev_flow/scripts/generate_traceability_matrices.py --output docs/generated/matrices/

Cross-Document Validation (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: After creating each artifact, execute cross-document validation before proceeding to the next layer.

Validation Phases

Phase Trigger Command

Phase 1 Per-document python scripts/validate_cross_document.py --document {doc_path} --auto-fix

Phase 2 Per-layer complete python scripts/validate_cross_document.py --layer {LAYER} --auto-fix

Phase 3 Final (all layers) python scripts/validate_cross_document.py --full --auto-fix

Automatic Validation Loop

LOOP:

1. Run: python scripts/validate_cross_document.py --document {doc_path} --auto-fix
2. IF errors fixed: GOTO LOOP (re-validate)
3. IF warnings fixed: GOTO LOOP (re-validate)
4. IF unfixable issues: Log for manual review, continue
5. IF clean: Mark VALIDATED, proceed to next layer

Layer-Specific Upstream Requirements

Layer Artifact Required Upstream Tags Tag Count

1 BRD (none - root) 0

2 PRD @brd 1

3 EARS @brd, @prd 2

4 BDD @brd, @prd, @ears 3

5 ADR @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd 4

6 SYS @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd, @adr 5

7 REQ @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd, @adr, @sys 6

8 IMPL @brd, @prd, @ears, @bdd, @adr, @sys, @req 7

9 CTR @brd through @req (+ optional @impl) 7-8

10 SPEC @brd through @req (+ optional @impl, @ctr) 7-9

11 TASKS @brd through @spec (+ optional @impl, @ctr) 8-10

Auto-Fix Actions (No Confirmation Required)

Issue Fix Action

Missing cumulative tag Add with upstream document reference

Invalid tag format Correct to TYPE.NN.TT.SS (4-segment) or TYPE-NN format

Broken link Recalculate path from current location

Missing traceability section Insert from template

Validation Codes Reference

Code Description Severity

XDOC-001 Referenced requirement ID not found ERROR

XDOC-002 Missing cumulative tag ERROR

XDOC-003 Upstream document not found ERROR

XDOC-004 Link target file missing WARNING

XDOC-005 Anchor in link not found WARNING

XDOC-006 Tag format invalid ERROR

XDOC-007 Gap in cumulative tag chain ERROR

XDOC-008 Circular reference detected ERROR

XDOC-009 Missing traceability section ERROR

XDOC-010 Orphaned document (no upstream refs) WARNING

Quality Gate

Blocking: YES - Cannot proceed to next layer until Phase 1 validation passes with 0 errors for the current artifact.

Related Resources

Core Standards (ai_dev_flow/)

Primary References - Authoritative Development Standard:

• Main Guide: SPEC_DRIVEN_DEVELOPMENT_GUIDE.md - Complete 15-layer workflow

• Workflow Diagram: index.md - Complete Mermaid diagram

• ID Standards: ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md - File naming, ID format rules

• Traceability: TRACEABILITY.md - Cross-reference format, link standards

• Quality Gates: TRACEABILITY_VALIDATION.md - Automated quality gates system

• Platform BRD Guide: PLATFORM_VS_FEATURE_BRD.md - Platform vs Feature BRD decision guide

• When to Create IMPL: WHEN_TO_CREATE_IMPL.md - IMPL vs direct REQ→SPEC decision guide

• README: README.md - Getting started guide

Templates Location

All templates located in ai_dev_flow/{artifact_type}/ :

• BRD (BRD/ ): 3 templates available (comprehensive, simplified, domain-specific)

• PRD (PRD/ ): PRD-TEMPLATE.md

• EARS (EARS/ ): EARS-TEMPLATE.md

• BDD (BDD/ ): BDD-TEMPLATE.feature

• ADR (ADR/ ): ADR-TEMPLATE.md , Technology Stack reference (ADR-000)

• SYS (SYS/ ): SYS-TEMPLATE.md

• REQ (REQ/ ): REQ-TEMPLATE.md (v3.0 with 12 sections)

• IMPL (IMPL/ ): IMPL-TEMPLATE.md

• CTR (CTR/ ): CTR-TEMPLATE.md

• CTR-TEMPLATE.yaml (dual-file)

• SPEC (10_SPEC/ ): SPEC-TEMPLATE.yaml

• TASKS (TASKS/ ): TASKS-TEMPLATE.md (includes Section 8 for Implementation Contracts)

• REF (root): REF-TEMPLATE.md (Reference Documents)

Each artifact type directory also contains:

• Index file: {TYPE}-00_index.{ext}

• README.md: Usage guide and best practices

• Creation Rules: {TYPE}_CREATION_RULES.md

• Validation Rules: {TYPE}_VALIDATION_RULES.md

Quick Reference Card

Decision Matrix

You Have You Need Use This Skill

Nothing Business requirements doc-brd

BRD Product requirements doc-prd

PRD Formal requirements doc-ears

EARS Test scenarios doc-bdd

BDD Architecture decisions doc-adr

ADR System requirements doc-sys

SYS Atomic requirements doc-req

REQ (complex) Implementation plan doc-impl

REQ (simple) Technical specs doc-spec

REQ/IMPL (interface) API contracts doc-ctr

REQ/CTR Technical specs doc-spec

SPEC Task breakdown doc-tasks

TASKS Code Implement!

Any stage Supplementary documentation doc-ref

Development ROI

• Traditional: 70 hours/component

• SDD: 1.5 hours/component

• Speed increase: 48x faster

• Consistency: 100% (template-based)

• Traceability: Automatic, bidirectional

Usage Example

User: "I need to implement position risk limit validation"

Assistant: "I'll guide you through the SDD workflow. Let me check what artifacts you have:

Current Status Check:

• Do you have a BRD documenting business requirements? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

• Do you have a PRD with product requirements? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

• Do you have EARS formal requirements? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

• Do you have BDD test scenarios? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

• Do you have ADR architecture decisions? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

• Do you have SYS system requirements? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

• Do you have REQ atomic requirements? [If no → SKIP this functionality]

⚠️ CRITICAL: Upstream Artifact Policy: If ANY required upstream artifact is missing, do NOT create it and do NOT implement the downstream functionality. The SDD workflow enforces strict document hierarchy - functionality without proper business/product justification should not exist.

Next Steps: Based on your current progress, I'll recommend the appropriate skill to use next. Each skill will guide you through creating that specific artifact type with proper templates, traceability, and validation."

For detailed artifact creation guidance, use the specific artifact skill (doc-brd, doc-prd, doc-ears, doc-bdd, doc-adr, doc-sys, doc-req, doc-impl, doc-ctr, doc-spec, doc-tasks, doc-ref, doc-naming).

Version History

Version Date Changes

1.4 2026-02-10T15:00:00 Updated version history dates to ISO 8601 format

1.3 2026-01-17T00:00:00 Updated to 15-layer architecture (Layers 0-14)

1.2 2025-12-29T00:00:00 Fixed workflow sequence; Added doc-naming and doc-validator to Integration section

1.1 2025-11-30T00:00:00 Added REF documents, ICON section

1.0 2025-11-01T00:00:00 Initial skill creation