Research Literature Review
Research topic: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
- PAPER_LIBRARY — Local directory containing user's paper collection (PDFs). Check these paths in order:
papers/in the current project directoryliterature/in the current project directory- Custom path specified by user in
CLAUDE.mdunder## Paper Library
- MAX_LOCAL_PAPERS = 20 — Maximum number of local PDFs to scan (read first 3 pages each). If more are found, prioritize by filename relevance to the topic.
- ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = false — When
true, download top 3-5 most relevant arXiv PDFs to PAPER_LIBRARY after search. Whenfalse(default), only fetch metadata (title, abstract, authors) via arXiv API — no files are downloaded. - ARXIV_MAX_DOWNLOAD = 5 — Maximum number of PDFs to download when
ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = true.
💡 Overrides:
/research-lit "topic" — paper library: ~/my_papers/— custom local PDF path/research-lit "topic" — sources: zotero, local— only search Zotero + local PDFs/research-lit "topic" — sources: zotero— only search Zotero/research-lit "topic" — sources: web— only search the web (skip all local)/research-lit "topic" — arxiv download: true— download top relevant arXiv PDFs/research-lit "topic" — arxiv download: true, max download: 10— download up to 10 PDFs
Data Sources
This skill checks multiple sources in priority order. All are optional — if a source is not configured or not requested, skip it silently.
Source Selection
Parse $ARGUMENTS for a — sources: directive:
- If
— sources:is specified: Only search the listed sources (comma-separated). Valid values:zotero,obsidian,local,web,all. - If not specified: Default to
all— search every available source in priority order.
Examples:
/research-lit "diffusion models" → all (default)
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: all → all
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: zotero → Zotero only
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: zotero, web → Zotero + web
/research-lit "diffusion models" — sources: local → local PDFs only
/research-lit "topic" — sources: obsidian, local, web → skip Zotero
Source Table
| Priority | Source | ID | How to detect | What it provides |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zotero (via MCP) | zotero | Try calling any mcp__zotero__* tool — if unavailable, skip | Collections, tags, annotations, PDF highlights, BibTeX, semantic search |
| 2 | Obsidian (via MCP) | obsidian | Try calling any mcp__obsidian-vault__* tool — if unavailable, skip | Research notes, paper summaries, tagged references, wikilinks |
| 3 | Local PDFs | local | Glob: papers/**/*.pdf, literature/**/*.pdf | Raw PDF content (first 3 pages) |
| 4 | Web search | web | Always available (WebSearch) | arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar |
Graceful degradation: If no MCP servers are configured, the skill works exactly as before (local PDFs + web search). Zotero and Obsidian are pure additions.
Workflow
Step 0a: Search Zotero Library (if available)
Skip this step entirely if Zotero MCP is not configured.
Try calling a Zotero MCP tool (e.g., search). If it succeeds:
- Search by topic: Use the Zotero search tool to find papers matching the research topic
- Read collections: Check if the user has a relevant collection/folder for this topic
- Extract annotations: For highly relevant papers, pull PDF highlights and notes — these represent what the user found important
- Export BibTeX: Get citation data for relevant papers (useful for
/paper-writelater) - Compile results: For each relevant Zotero entry, extract:
- Title, authors, year, venue
- User's annotations/highlights (if any)
- Tags the user assigned
- Which collection it belongs to
📚 Zotero annotations are gold — they show what the user personally highlighted as important, which is far more valuable than generic summaries.
Step 0b: Search Obsidian Vault (if available)
Skip this step entirely if Obsidian MCP is not configured.
Try calling an Obsidian MCP tool (e.g., search). If it succeeds:
- Search vault: Search for notes related to the research topic
- Check tags: Look for notes tagged with relevant topics (e.g.,
#diffusion-models,#paper-review) - Read research notes: For relevant notes, extract the user's own summaries and insights
- Follow links: If notes link to other relevant notes (wikilinks), follow them for additional context
- Compile results: For each relevant note:
- Note title and path
- User's summary/insights
- Links to other notes (research graph)
- Any frontmatter metadata (paper URL, status, rating)
📝 Obsidian notes represent the user's processed understanding — more valuable than raw paper content for understanding their perspective.
Step 0c: Scan Local Paper Library
Before searching online, check if the user already has relevant papers locally:
-
Locate library: Check PAPER_LIBRARY paths for PDF files
Glob: papers/**/*.pdf, literature/**/*.pdf -
De-duplicate against Zotero: If Step 0a found papers, skip any local PDFs already covered by Zotero results (match by filename or title).
-
Filter by relevance: Match filenames and first-page content against the research topic. Skip clearly unrelated papers.
-
Summarize relevant papers: For each relevant local PDF (up to MAX_LOCAL_PAPERS):
- Read first 3 pages (title, abstract, intro)
- Extract: title, authors, year, core contribution, relevance to topic
- Flag papers that are directly related vs tangentially related
-
Build local knowledge base: Compile summaries into a "papers you already have" section. This becomes the starting point — external search fills the gaps.
📚 If no local papers are found, skip to Step 1. If the user has a comprehensive local collection, the external search can be more targeted (focus on what's missing).
Step 1: Search (external)
- Use WebSearch to find recent papers on the topic
- Check arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar
- Focus on papers from last 2 years unless studying foundational work
- De-duplicate: Skip papers already found in Zotero, Obsidian, or local library
arXiv API search (always runs, no download by default):
Locate the fetch script and search arXiv directly:
# Try to find arxiv_fetch.py
SCRIPT=$(find tools/ -name "arxiv_fetch.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)
# If not found, check ARIS install
[ -z "$SCRIPT" ] && SCRIPT=$(find ~/.claude/skills/arxiv/ -name "arxiv_fetch.py" 2>/dev/null | head -1)
# Search arXiv API for structured results (title, abstract, authors, categories)
python3 "$SCRIPT" search "QUERY" --max 10
If arxiv_fetch.py is not found, fall back to WebSearch for arXiv (same as before).
The arXiv API returns structured metadata (title, abstract, full author list, categories, dates) — richer than WebSearch snippets. Merge these results with WebSearch findings and de-duplicate.
Optional PDF download (only when ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = true):
After all sources are searched and papers are ranked by relevance:
# Download top N most relevant arXiv papers
python3 "$SCRIPT" download ARXIV_ID --dir papers/
- Only download papers ranked in the top ARXIV_MAX_DOWNLOAD by relevance
- Skip papers already in the local library
- 1-second delay between downloads (rate limiting)
- Verify each PDF > 10 KB
Step 2: Analyze Each Paper
For each relevant paper (from all sources), extract:
- Problem: What gap does it address?
- Method: Core technical contribution (1-2 sentences)
- Results: Key numbers/claims
- Relevance: How does it relate to our work?
- Source: Where we found it (Zotero/Obsidian/local/web) — helps user know what they already have vs what's new
Step 3: Synthesize
- Group papers by approach/theme
- Identify consensus vs disagreements in the field
- Find gaps that our work could fill
- If Obsidian notes exist, incorporate the user's own insights into the synthesis
Step 4: Output
Present as a structured literature table:
| Paper | Venue | Method | Key Result | Relevance to Us | Source |
|-------|-------|--------|------------|-----------------|--------|
Plus a narrative summary of the landscape (3-5 paragraphs).
If Zotero BibTeX was exported, include a references.bib snippet for direct use in paper writing.
Step 5: Save (if requested)
- Save paper PDFs to
literature/orpapers/ - Update related work notes in project memory
- If Obsidian is available, optionally create a literature review note in the vault
Key Rules
- Always include paper citations (authors, year, venue)
- Distinguish between peer-reviewed and preprints
- Be honest about limitations of each paper
- Note if a paper directly competes with or supports our approach
- Never fail because a MCP server is not configured — always fall back gracefully to the next data source
- Zotero/Obsidian tools may have different names depending on how the user configured the MCP server (e.g.,
mcp__zotero__searchormcp__zotero-mcp__search_items). Try the most common patterns and adapt.