git-workflow

Git operations: conventional commits, PR descriptions, branch strategy, conflict resolution, code archaeology, bisect. Use for git workflow tasks. NOT for code review, CI/CD, or changelogs.

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "git-workflow" with this command: npx skills add wyattowalsh/agents/wyattowalsh-agents-git-workflow

Git Workflow

Git operations assistant. Lightweight, high-frequency tool for commit messages, PR descriptions, branch strategy, conflict resolution, code archaeology, and bisect debugging.

Scope: Git workflow operations only. NOT for code review (honest-review), CI/CD pipelines (devops-engineer), changelogs or release notes (changelog-writer), or writing application code.

Dispatch

$ARGUMENTSMode
commitGenerate conventional commit message from staged diff
prGenerate PR description from branch diff
strategyRecommend branch strategy for project
conflictGuide merge conflict resolution
archaeology <file or function>Analyze git history for code understanding
bisectAssist with git bisect to find regression commits
EmptyShow mode menu with examples

Canonical Vocabulary

Use these terms exactly throughout all modes:

TermDefinition
conventional commitStructured commit format: type(scope): subject per Conventional Commits 1.0
commit typeOne of: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, revert
breaking changeCommit with ! suffix or BREAKING CHANGE: footer requiring major version bump
scopeOptional parenthesized component name after type: feat(auth): ...
trunk-basedStrategy where all developers commit to main/trunk with short-lived feature branches
git-flowStrategy with develop, feature, release, and hotfix branches
github-flowSimplified strategy: main + feature branches with PR-based merging
conflict markerGit-inserted <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> delimiters in conflicted files
blamegit blame annotation showing last modifier per line
archaeologyUsing git history commands to understand why code exists
bisectBinary search through commits to find the one introducing a bug
good/bad commitBisect terminology: good = before bug, bad = after bug

Mode 1: Commit

Generate a conventional commit message from the current staged diff.

Commit Steps

  1. Run git diff --cached to get staged changes
  2. If nothing staged, run git diff and report: "No staged changes. Stage files first with git add."
  3. Run uv run python skills/git-workflow/scripts/diff-summarizer.py on the diff output
  4. Analyze the diff to determine:
    • Type: feat/fix/docs/style/refactor/perf/test/build/ci/chore/revert
    • Scope: affected component (from file paths, module names)
    • Subject: imperative, lowercase, no period, max 72 chars
    • Body: what changed and why (wrap at 72 chars)
    • Breaking: whether BREAKING CHANGE: footer is needed
  5. Reference data/conventional-commits.json rules for type selection
  6. Present the commit message. Ask: "Commit with this message? [yes / edit / cancel]"
  7. If approved, run git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'\n<message>\nEOF\n)"

Mode 2: PR

Generate a PR description from the branch diff against the base branch.

PR Steps

  1. Detect base branch: git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@refs/remotes/origin/@@' (fallback: main)
  2. Run git log --oneline <base>..HEAD to list commits
  3. Run uv run python skills/git-workflow/scripts/commit-parser.py on git log output
  4. Run git diff <base>...HEAD --stat for change statistics
  5. Run uv run python skills/git-workflow/scripts/diff-summarizer.py on the diff stat
  6. Generate PR description with:
    • Title: short summary under 70 chars
    • Summary: 1-3 bullet points of what changed
    • Changes: grouped by commit type from parsed commits
    • Test plan: checklist of verification steps
    • Breaking changes: if any commits have breaking changes
  7. Present the description. Ask: "Create PR with this? [yes / edit / skip]"

Mode 3: Strategy

Recommend a branch strategy for the project.

Strategy Steps

  1. Analyze the repository:
    • Team size: check git shortlog -sn --all | wc -l
    • Release cadence: check tags with git tag -l --sort=-creatordate | head -20
    • Branch count: git branch -r | wc -l
    • CI/CD presence: check for .github/workflows/, Jenkinsfile, .gitlab-ci.yml
  2. Reference data/branch-strategies.json for strategy comparison
  3. Score each strategy against the project profile
  4. Present recommendation with:
    • Recommended strategy and why
    • Comparison table showing trade-offs
    • Migration steps if switching from current approach
    • Team size and release cadence alignment

Mode 4: Conflict

Guide merge conflict resolution.

Conflict Steps

  1. Run git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U to list conflicted files
  2. If no conflicts: "No merge conflicts detected."
  3. For each conflicted file:
    • Read the file to identify conflict markers
    • Analyze both sides (ours vs theirs)
    • Check git log --merge -p -- <file> for context on diverging changes
    • Determine the intent of each side
  4. Present resolution guidance per file:
    • What each side changed and why
    • Recommended resolution (keep ours / keep theirs / merge both / rewrite)
    • The resolved content
  5. Ask: "Apply this resolution? [yes / edit / skip per file]"
  6. After resolving: remind to git add <files> and continue the merge/rebase

Mode 5: Archaeology

Analyze git history to understand why code exists and how it evolved.

Archaeology Steps

  1. Parse $ARGUMENTS[1] as a file path or function name
  2. For file paths:
    • git log --follow --oneline -- <file> for full history
    • git log --follow --diff-filter=A -- <file> for creation commit
    • git blame <file> for line-by-line attribution
  3. For function names:
    • git log -p --all -S '<function>' -- '*.py' '*.js' '*.ts' (pickaxe search)
    • git log -L :<function>:<file> if file is known (function-level log)
  4. Analyze the history to answer:
    • When was this code introduced and by whom?
    • What was the original intent? (from commit messages)
    • How has it evolved? (key modification commits)
    • Are there related changes in other files?
  5. Present a narrative timeline with key commits and their context

Mode 6: Bisect

Assist with git bisect to find the commit that introduced a regression.

Bisect Steps

  1. Ask for (if not provided):
    • Bad commit: where the bug exists (default: HEAD)
    • Good commit: where the bug did not exist
    • Test command: how to verify (optional, for git bisect run)
  2. Start bisect: git bisect start <bad> <good>
  3. If test command provided:
    • Run git bisect run <command>
    • Parse output for the first bad commit
  4. If manual:
    • At each step, explain the current commit context
    • Ask: "Is this commit good or bad?"
    • Run git bisect good or git bisect bad
  5. When bisect identifies the commit:
    • Show the full commit with git show <hash>
    • Explain what the commit changed
    • Suggest investigation areas
  6. Clean up: git bisect reset

Reference Files

Load ONE reference at a time. Do not preload all references into context.

FileContentLoad When
references/commit-and-pr-guide.mdConventional commit patterns, PR templates, diff analysiscommit or pr mode
references/branch-strategies.mdStrategy comparison, migration paths, team sizingstrategy mode
references/history-and-debugging.mdConflict resolution, archaeology techniques, bisect patternsconflict, archaeology, or bisect mode
Data FileContentLoad When
data/conventional-commits.jsonFull spec as structured data with type definitionscommit mode (script input)
data/branch-strategies.jsonStrategy comparison with pros/cons/team sizestrategy mode (script input)
ScriptWhen to Run
scripts/commit-parser.pypr mode -- parse git log into structured JSON
scripts/diff-summarizer.pycommit or pr mode -- summarize diff statistics

Critical Rules

  1. Never commit without user approval -- always present the message first
  2. Never force-push, reset --hard, or run destructive git commands
  3. Always use conventional commit format per the spec in data/conventional-commits.json
  4. Commit subjects must be imperative, lowercase, no period, max 72 chars
  5. PR descriptions must link changes to evidence from the diff
  6. Never skip git bisect reset after a bisect session
  7. Archaeology mode is read-only -- never modify code or history
  8. Conflict resolution must explain both sides before recommending
  9. Branch strategy must consider actual team size and release cadence, not ideals
  10. Scripts output JSON to stdout -- parse programmatically, never regex
  11. Stage-before-commit: if diff --cached is empty, do not fabricate a commit message
  12. Do not generate changelogs or release notes -- redirect to changelog-writer

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

Coding

python-conventions

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

devops-engineer

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Coding

infrastructure-coder

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
Automation

honest-review

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review