spec-driven-implementation

Spec-Driven Implementation Skill

Safety Notice

This listing is imported from skills.sh public index metadata. Review upstream SKILL.md and repository scripts before running.

Copy this and send it to your AI assistant to learn

Install skill "spec-driven-implementation" with this command: npx skills add xbklairith/kisune/xbklairith-kisune-spec-driven-implementation

Spec-Driven Implementation Skill

Purpose

Guide feature implementation through two structured phases: Task Breakdown (TDD) → Execution. Ensures test-driven development, quality gates, and tracked progress from design to working code.

Activation Triggers

Activate this skill when:

  • User says "implement this feature" or "let's code this"

  • User mentions "tasks", "TDD", or "execution"

  • User uses /dev-workflow:spec command with implementation options (tasks, execute)

  • User is ready to start implementation after design approval

  • Design phase is complete and approved

Prerequisites

Requires completed planning from spec-driven-planning skill:

  • Feature directory exists: docx/features/[NN-feature-name]/

  • requirements.md is complete with EARS requirements

  • design.md is complete and approved

If prerequisites are missing:

"Implementation requires completed planning. Run /dev-workflow:spec and complete options 1-3 first (Feature Creation, Requirements, Design)."

Phase 4: Task Breakdown (TDD Focus)

Goal: Break design into small, testable tasks following Red-Green-Refactor

Task Structure:

Each task follows TDD cycle:

[ ] Task N: [Description] [ ] RED: Write failing test for [functionality] [ ] GREEN: Implement minimal code to pass test [ ] REFACTOR: Clean up and optimize

Acceptance Criteria:
[ ] [Specific criterion 1]
[ ] [Specific criterion 2]
Linked Requirements: REQ-###, REQ-###

Traceability Rules:

  • Every task must list the requirement IDs it satisfies (from requirements.md)

  • All requirements must appear in at least one task

  • Repeat IDs across tasks if a requirement spans multiple tasks

Task Sizing: 30-60 minutes each. If longer, break into subtasks. Each task must be independently testable and produce working, tested code.

UltraThink Before Task Breakdown: Before breaking design into tasks, activate deep thinking if design involves complex algorithms, unclear integration points, multiple strategies, or non-trivial edge cases.

"Let me ultrathink the implementation strategy before breaking this into tasks."

Questions to ultrathink:

  • What's the simplest implementation that satisfies requirements?

  • Where are the hidden complexities?

  • What assumptions might break during implementation?

  • How will we test each component in isolation?

Task Categories:

  • Component Tasks - Individual components implementation

  • Integration Tasks - Connect components, test interactions, verify data flow

  • Error Handling Tasks - Error scenarios, edge cases, error messages

  • Documentation Tasks - Docstrings, README updates, API docs

  • Final Verification Tasks - Code review, performance, security, manual testing

Output: Update docx/features/[NN-feature-name]/tasks.md with implementation approach summary, organized task list with checkboxes, acceptance criteria, and notes.

"Tasks defined with TDD cycle. Ready to begin implementation?"

Phase 5: Execution

Goal: Execute tasks systematically with quality gates

For each task:

Mark Task as In Progress - Edit tasks.md : [ ] Task N → [→] Task N , mark RED as [→]

RED Phase - Write failing test, verify failure, Edit to check off RED [x] , commit: test: Add test for [functionality]

GREEN Phase - Write minimal implementation, all tests must pass, Edit to check off GREEN [x] , commit: feat: Implement [functionality]

REFACTOR Phase - Clean up code, tests still passing, Edit to check off REFACTOR [x] , commit: refactor: Optimize [component]

Mark Task Complete - Edit: [→] Task N → [x] Task N , verify acceptance criteria checked, update Progress Summary

Task Tracking Protocol

CRITICAL: Use Edit tool to update tasks.md - don't just announce progress.

Start Phase 5 ↓ Edit: Status "Not Started" → "In Progress" ↓ For each task: Edit: [ ] Task N → [→] Task N Edit: [ ] RED → [→] RED Write failing test Edit: [→] RED → [x] RED, [ ] GREEN → [→] GREEN Implement code Edit: [→] GREEN → [x] GREEN, [ ] REFACTOR → [→] REFACTOR Refactor code Edit: [→] REFACTOR → [x] REFACTOR, [→] Task N → [x] Task N Edit: Update Progress Summary ↓ Next task or finish ↓ Edit: Status "In Progress" → "Complete"

Announcing progress is NOT updating files. Always use Edit tool to modify tasks.md, then announce.

Progress Summary Maintenance

Keep the Progress Summary section in tasks.md synchronized after every task:

  • Total Tasks: 10
  • Completed: X/10
  • In Progress: Task N - [description]

Status Checkpoints

Every 2-3 completed tasks:

Checkpoint Update:

  • Tests: [N/N] passing
  • Type check: No errors
  • Lint: Clean
  • Completed tasks: [X/Y]
  • Next: [Next task description] [Confidence: X.X]

Auto-Trigger Code Quality Review

Before each commit, invoke dev-workflow:review to review changes and address critical findings.

Integration Skills:

  • dev-workflow:test-driven-development

  • Strict TDD guidance

  • dev-workflow:git-workflow

  • Smart commits

  • dev-workflow:review

  • Pre-commit reviews

Completion Criteria:

  • All tasks checked off

  • All tests passing

  • No linter errors

  • No type errors

  • Code review passed

  • Documentation updated

  • Manual testing complete

Final Output:

Feature Complete: [Feature Name]

Summary:

  • Total tasks: [N]
  • Tests added: [N]
  • Test coverage: [X%]
  • Commits: [N]
  • Files changed: [N]

Ready to create PR or merge to main?

TDD Principles

Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

  • RED: Write a test that describes what the code should do. It MUST fail because the code doesn't exist yet.

  • GREEN: Write MINIMUM code to make the test pass. Don't optimize, just make it work.

  • REFACTOR: Improve the code (remove duplication, improve naming, simplify). Run tests after each change.

TDD Rules

DO: Write test before code (always RED first), write smallest test possible, run tests frequently, commit at each phase, keep tests fast and independent.

DON'T: Write production code without a failing test, write multiple tests before implementation, skip refactor phase, test implementation details (test behavior), let tests become slow or flaky.

Example: Task Breakdown

User: "/dev-workflow:spec tasks"

Assistant:

Activating Phase 4: Task Breakdown

Found feature: docx/features/01-user-authentication/ Reading design to create TDD tasks...

[ ] Task 1: User model with password hashing [ ] RED: Test password hashing on save [ ] GREEN: Implement bcrypt hashing [ ] REFACTOR: Extract hashing to utility Acceptance Criteria: [ ] Passwords are hashed before storage [ ] Original password is not stored Linked Requirements: REQ-001, REQ-002

[...more tasks...]

Tasks defined. Ready to begin implementation?

Back to Planning

If during implementation you discover missing requirements, design changes needed, or unclear specifications:

"Implementation blocked: [issue]. Need to revisit [requirements/design]. Use /dev-workflow:spec [requirements/design] to update planning documents."

Invoke dev-workflow:spec-driven-planning to update planning documents before continuing.

Critical Reminders

  • NEVER write production code without a failing test first

  • ALWAYS use Edit tool to update tasks.md checkboxes - don't just announce progress

  • ALWAYS update Progress Summary after each task completion

  • Update Status header when starting/completing implementation

  • Follow TDD cycle religiously (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR)

  • Provide checkpoint updates every 2-3 tasks

  • Stop and return to planning if design issues discovered

Source Transparency

This detail page is rendered from real SKILL.md content. Trust labels are metadata-based hints, not a safety guarantee.

Related Skills

Related by shared tags or category signals.

General

spec-driven-planning

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

pattern-recognition

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review
General

strategy-translator

No summary provided by upstream source.

Repository SourceNeeds Review