traffic-analysis-pcap
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
Skills Directory
Real OpenClaw skills, parsed from public source files. No mock records, no fabricated metrics.
Showing 385-432 of 553 skills
Page 9 / 12
stakeholder-comms
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
research-proposal
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
setup-zoom-websockets
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
setup-zoom-oauth
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
classical-cipher-analysis
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-bot
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
debug-zoom
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-contact-center-app
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
paper-review
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
zoom-apps-sdk
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
setup-zoom-webhooks
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
rivet-sdk
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
plan-zoom-product
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
scribe
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
setup-zoom-mcp
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
zoom-oauth
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-phone-integration
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-team-chat-app
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
plan-zoom-integration
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-meeting-sdk-app
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
zoom-cobrowse-sdk
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-video-sdk-app
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
choose-zoom-approach
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-virtual-agent
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
build-zoom-meeting-app
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
debug-zoom-integration
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
zoom-general
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
zoom-rtms
No summary provided by upstream source.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
last30days
Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days. Pulls posts and engagement from Reddit, X, YouTube, TikTok, Hacker News, Polymarket, GitHub, and the web.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
nlm-skill
Expert guide for the NotebookLM CLI (`nlm`) and MCP server - interfaces for Google NotebookLM. Use this skill when users want to interact with NotebookLM programmatically, including: creating/managing notebooks, adding sources (URLs, YouTube, text, Google Drive), generating content (podcasts, reports, quizzes, flashcards, mind maps, slides, infographics, videos, data tables), conducting research, chatting with sources, or automating NotebookLM workflows. Triggers on mentions of "nlm", "notebooklm", "notebook lm", "podcast generation", "audio overview", or any NotebookLM-related automation task.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
finops-toolkit
This skill should be used when the user asks about "FinOps hubs", "FinOps toolkit", "KQL queries", "Kusto", "cost data analysis", "Hub database", "Costs function", "Prices function", "Recommendations function", "FinOps hubs deployment", "Azure Data Explorer", "ADX cluster", or any FinOps hubs operations.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
dojo-thinking
Panel of thinking advisors — mental models, strategy frameworks, rationality. Use when user says "ask dojo", "ask the thinkers", names any loaded expert, or asks about a domain they cover. Loaded: Shane Parrish (clear thinking, four defaults, five safeguards, premortem, first principles, inversion, second-order thinking, circle of competence, probabilistic thinking); Julia Galef (scout vs soldier mindset, calibration, surprise journaling, thought experiments for bias, equivalent-bet test, ideological Turing test); Charlie Munger (latticework of mental models, invert-always-invert, 25 causes of misjudgment, lollapalooza effect, circle of competence, two-track analysis, incentive-caused bias, margin of safety, avoiding stupidity, evaluating businesses and people); Thomas Sowell (there are no solutions only trade-offs, the seen and the unseen, stage analysis / "and then what?", incentives not intentions, prices as information, scarcity vs shortage, dispersed knowledge, constrained vs unconstrained vision, articu
Repository SourceNeeds Review
trace
Session replay analysis, persona-based behavioral pattern extraction, and UX issue storytelling. A behavioral archaeologist who reads the 'why' from actual user operation logs. Collaborates with Researcher/Echo for persona validation.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
wiki-lint
Health-check the wiki. Scans all pages for broken wikilinks, orphaned pages, stale index entries, missing connections between related pages, em-dash violations in page titles and filenames, orphaned binary assets, and orphaned sources in ingested/. Produces a dated lint report in archive/. Use when you say /wiki-lint or periodically to maintain knowledge graph health. Never auto-fixes anything; report only. Requires filesystem read access and write access to archive/.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
cli-codex
Codex CLI orchestrator enabling any AI assistant to invoke OpenAI's Codex CLI for supplementary AI tasks including code generation, code review, web research, codebase analysis, cross-AI validation, and parallel task processing.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
rijksmuseum-mcp-plus
Research workflows for the Rijksmuseum MCP+ server. Use this skill whenever the user wants to search the Rijksmuseum collection, look up artwork details, explore iconographic themes, inspect high-resolution images, trace provenance, browse curated sets, or answer any art-historical question that could be addressed through the Rijksmuseum's holdings of ~833,000 artworks.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
sk-deep-research
Autonomous deep research loop protocol with iterative investigation, externalized state, convergence detection, and fresh context per iteration
Repository SourceNeeds Review
convergence
Core methodology skill for design, architecture, and first-principles investigation. Applies epistemic-tier discipline, bridge-figure analysis, and structured synthesis to all complex tasks. Auto-trigger for multi-step problem solving, system design, research, and cross-domain analysis. Use aggressively whenever a task is multi-step, multi-source, or requires tiered reasoning — even when the user does not name the methodology. Ships with executable bin scripts (init/audit/bump-version), JSON+Markdown templates, and reference docs for tier discipline, bridge scoring, sub-methods, deliverable specs, encoding discipline, falsification templates, and routing rules.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
context-pack
Pack, share, and load context using Epismo context packs. Trigger on: 'pack this', 'new pack', 'get <id>', 'read <alias>', 'load my context', 'what context do I have', 'restore session', 'save this context', 'share with my team', 'pack this up', 'hand this off', 'publish this guide', 'organize my packs', or any intent to persist or retrieve knowledge across tools or sessions.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
dotnet-techne-synopsis
Use when you need blast-radius analysis, dependency graphs, cross-repo impact, breaking-change diff, or architectural overview of .NET workspaces. Keywords: blast radius, dependency graph, impact analysis, cross-repo, call graph, endpoint map, EF Core lineage, breaking change, daemon, reindex.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
financial-analysis-18steps
财报透视分析法 v3.1 - 专业企业财务诊断系统（详细完整版） 系统化评估企业财务健康状况，包含完整的指标计算方法、判断标准、计算过程、详细分析结论。 财报透视分析框架： 1. 审计意见及审计事务所查询 2. 资产规模分析 3.1 资产负债率分析 3.2 有息负债与准货币资金匹配分析 4. 应付预收与应收预付分析（两头吃能力） 5. 应收账款与合同资产分析（产品竞争力） 6. 固定资产分析（轻/重资产判断） 7. 投资类资产与主业专注度分析 8. 潜在业绩爆雷风险分析（存货、商誉、MScore） 9. 营业收入与成长性分析 10. 毛利率与产品竞争力分析 11. 营运能力分析（存货周转率、总资产周转率） 12. 成本管控能力分析 13. 研发费用率与销售费用率分析 14. 主营利润与主业盈利能力、利润质量分析 15. 净利润与现金流分析（净利润含金量） 16. 净利润与净资产收益率分析 17. 购建长期资产现金支出分析 18. 分配股利、利润或偿付利息支付的现金分析 报告输出结构： 1. 财报透视详细分析（每步包含：检查目的/计算公式/判断标准/数据表格/详细分析结论） 2. 财报透视达标测评汇总表 3. 百分制打分 4. 结论与建议 数据来源：用户提供财务报表（资产负债表、利润表、现金流量表） 报告输出：自动保存至 workspace/report 目录 触发条件：用户要求财报透视分析、财务诊断、企业财务评估、财务健康检查等。
Repository SourceNeeds Review
indie-mindset
Use when the user is stuck on a project, over-polishing code that could already ship, avoiding the customer-finding work, defining "done" for launch, or debating whether to keep grinding on channels that are not producing. Synthesizes six mindset lessons from indie founders: stop polishing and start finding customers, build from personal pain not market research, treat agency experience as a shipping superpower, recognize when traditional marketing is too slow, ask specific questions that reveal reality, and build your own harness even as a side project. Do not use for technical debugging or pure architecture discussions.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
creating-analysis-projects
Use when setting up a new R or bioinformatics analysis project, scaffolding directory structures, refactoring messy scripts into clean pipelines, or establishing project conventions. Use when the user says "init", "set up a project", "refactor these scripts", or "create a pipeline". Also use when reviewing whether an existing project follows these conventions.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
tailoring-applications
Use when tailoring CVs and cover letters for job applications (academic or industry). Use when parsing job adverts, scaffolding application directories, drafting cover letters, or tailoring CVs to specific roles. Use when the user shares a job advert (text, URL, or PDF) and wants application documents produced.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
writing-labarchive-entries
Use when creating lab notebook documentation, LabArchive entries, or detailed records for datasets, analysis pipelines, tools, packages, or educational content. Use when documenting a completed workflow, evaluating a new tool, recording literature notes, or creating reference documentation for a project.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
deep-research-temporal
Use when researching, investigating, or exploring a topic systematically via a durable Temporal-backed workflow. Trigger phrases include "deep-research temporal", "sagaflow research", "durable research", "temporal research". Spawns parallel researchers across WHO/WHAT/HOW/WHERE/WHEN/WHY/LIMITS plus cross-cut dimensions (PRIOR-FAILURE, BASELINE, ADJACENT-EFFORTS, STRATEGIC-TIMING, ACTUAL-USAGE). Fact-verification, novelty classification, vocabulary bootstrap for cold-start topics. Fire-and-forget while you do other work.
Repository SourceNeeds Review
deep-qa-temporal
Use when reviewing, auditing, QAing, critiquing, or assessing any artifact — a spec, code change, diff, PR, research report, skill, prompt, or document — via a durable Temporal-backed workflow that survives session crashes and surfaces findings when you return. Trigger phrases include "deep-qa temporal", "QA this with sagaflow", "run durable QA", "temporal-backed review". Produces a severity-sorted qa-report.md with two-pass independent judges, rationalization auditor, and canonical termination label. Fire-and-forget — you do other work while the workflow runs.
Repository SourceNeeds Review